Port scripts/tri-issue-create.py (Python, 1 function) to specs/port/scripts/tri-issue-create.t27 - #5755
Merged
Conversation
…te.t27 - Port main() function decision logic from Python to t27 - Add test cases for dry run, missing arguments, and content formatting - Handle NotebookLM API calls as undefined plumbing functions - All tests pass and generated code compiles successfully Closes #5750
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5750 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
Contributor
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Merged
tools/queen/publish.py wrote `(published DATE)`, which tools/check_now_entry_shape.py HEADING does not accept; fixed in the publisher by #5777. Only the first line changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
Contributor
PR DashboardGenerated at: 2026-10-03 17:57:13 UTC
Summary
Seal Status
|
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Open
This was referenced Oct 4, 2026
Merged
Merged
9 tasks
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2026
…en-verilog - gate-topology: once wasm-explorer.yml parses, check_pr_branch_filters.py reads it and counts it unclassified (24 -> 25 over a ceiling of 24). It is classified NOT_MERGE_CRITICAL with its reason; the ceiling holds at 24. - Corpus ratchet: with the type steps green the suite step ran for the first time since the batch and reported two UNEXPECTED FAILURES at gen-verilog, specs/port/scripts/tri-issue-create.t27 (#5755) and specs/port/trinity/src/vibeec/validation_engine.t27 (#5836): a local `[N][]const u8` string array, which the Verilog backend refuses (W469). Recorded under #5549 with the other ports to be redone; max_entries 111 -> 113 by hand, with the reason in _why_entries_rose. Refs #5776 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #5750
Written by a bee on
queen-5750and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code