Repository navigation
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 6, 2026
Merged
feat(crm-story-reel): v26 the owner's own reel may name the house, every end card has a ground
#6880
Merged
Open
Merged
Closed
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 6, 2026
Merged
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5166765?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head d5532de7507a0ee40677acdbdbaab2228de76d4c (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 6 turns, 83 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 4 turns, 60 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: Ported all 4 required functions to the boundary file with 8 passing tests, no implementation defects, and all acceptance criteria met
criterion: Criterion 1 -- met -- evidence: brief:606
criterion: Criterion 2 -- met -- evidence: brief:607
criterion: Criterion 3 -- met -- evidence: brief:608
criterion: Criterion 4 -- met -- evidence: brief:609
criterion: Criterion 5 -- met -- evidence: brief:610
criterion: Criterion 6 -- met -- evidence: brief:611
criterion: Criterion 7 -- met -- evidence: brief:612
discounted-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- pre-existing type name conflict on master, tracked in corpus ledger as expected failure (not a defect introduced by this PR)
discounted-check: cli-tri -- pre-existing census movement and runtime skips on master, baseline holds with no new skips (brief:552-602)
discounted-check: emit-bitexact -- pre-existing failure on master affecting orbitofrontal_value.t27, unrelated to this PR (brief:448-498)
discounted-check: spec-guards -- pre-existing drift on master affecting ring-096 and ring-097, unrelated to this PR (brief:500-550)
Evidence
Analysis
1. Does the change do what issue #6383 asks?
Issue #6383 asks for:
- Port 4 functions (
encodeF32ToGF16,decodeGF16ToF32,encodeBF16,decodeBF16) fromsrc/brain/fusiform_gyrus.zigtospecs/port/trinity/src/brain/fusiform_gyrus.t27 - Add at least 4 test blocks asserting on behavior from the original
- Only change the specified file (boundary:
specs/port/trinity/src/brain/fusiform_gyrus.t27)
All acceptance criteria met:
- Criterion 1:
test -f specs/port/trinity/src/brain/fusiform_gyrus.t27 && echo presentprintspresent— met (brief: line 606) - Criterion 2: All 4 functions ported under their names — met (brief: line 607)
- Criterion 3: Generated code has no "not yet implemented" — met (brief: line 608)
- Criterion 4: Generated code has >12 lines — met (brief: line 609)
- Criterion 5: File parses (
IMPLEMENTED, notNOPARSE) — met (brief: line 610) - Criterion 6: At least 4 test blocks — met (brief: line 611, runner shows 8 tests)
- Criterion 7: Generated code compiles, no
BLOCKED— met (brief: line 612)
Boundary verification:
The PR creates two files:
specs/port/trinity/src/brain/fusiform_gyrus.t27(115 lines) — the required spec filedocs/now/2026-10-06-published-port-ghashtag-trinity-src-brain-fusiform-gyrus-zig-zig-4-fun.md(11 lines)
The docs/now file is explicitly documented as auto-generated by the publisher (see brief: "This entry is written by the publisher, not by the bee. A bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now is neither."). The PR body correctly states "1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)" referring only to the .t27 file.
This is not an edit to another spec and the docs/now entry is a publishing artifact, not work the bee wrote. The core change is only the boundary file.
2. Red checks analysis
Red checks that do NOT count against this head:
-
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger)— the log shows the failure is a pre-existing "type name may not gain a second definition" issue on master (last 6 commits of master) that was queued but not run, and it's tracked in the corpus ledger as an expected failure (not a new defect introduced by this PR). -
emit-bitexact— the log shows this is a pre-existing failure on master (last 6 commits of master), affectingspecs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27, unrelated to this PR's changes. -
spec-guards— the log shows this is a pre-existing drift on master (last 6 commits), affecting multiple rings (ring-096, ring-097), not caused by this PR. -
cli-tri— the log shows "No new runtime skips. Baseline holds" and the census movement is the pre-existing "run: steps 291 → 292" mentioned in the brief's "On master" field, not a new defect.
None of these red checks are caused by this PR's changes; they're all pre-existing infrastructure/corpus issues.
No blocking-check: All PR changes are sound and meet all acceptance criteria.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- Successfully ported 4 functions from Zig to .t27 format within boundary, all acceptance criteria met
t27-bees
Bot
added
the
bee-reviewed
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 7, 2026 07:25
gHashTag
disabled auto-merge
October 7, 2026 07:32
Contributor
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 12, 2026 05:05
gHashTag
disabled auto-merge
October 12, 2026 05:05
…ity/src/brain/fusiform_gyrus.t27 Closes #6383
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6383 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
PR DashboardGenerated at: 2026-10-12 10:14:24 UTC
Summary
Seal Status
|
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 12, 2026 10:22
gHashTag
disabled auto-merge
October 12, 2026 10:23
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6383 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #6383
Written by a bee on
queen-6383and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code