Repository navigation
Conversation
Each test block contains 4 assertions verifying constants declared in the spec. Closes #6481
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6481 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 0097fc92a910c276ed00cdbfca0c3392426c3769 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 10 turns, 688 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: FR-006 not met (PR body missing required t27b-blog: +N <spec paths> format); emit-bitexact check newly fails to generate spec orbitofrontal_value.t27
criterion: FR-006 -- unmet -- evidence: brief.md:60,70,80,90,100,110,120 (PR body says "A bee's work on #6481" but lacks format)
discounted-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- on master: queued, failure is unrelated type name conflict (Rng)
blocking-check: emit-bitexact -- NEW failure: specs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27 fails to generate (brief.md:197-200)
Evidence
Analysis
Issue #6481 Requirements
The issue asks to add test blocks to 7 spec files in the specs/functions/ directory. Requirements are:
FR-001: Append exactly one test block at the end of each spec - MET
- Each of the 7 specs now has
test test_constants { ... }at the end beforeendmodule
FR-002: Each test has at least 4 assert lines - MET
- Each test block has exactly 4 asserts (KIND, ID, TRIGGER, RETRIES)
- Verified:
grep -cE '^[[:space]]+assert'prints 4 for each file
FR-003: Every assert holds - MET
- All 14 success criteria passed:
t27c test-reportprints "FAIL 0" and "pass 2" for each spec
FR-004: Files stay ASCII-only - MET
- All changes use ASCII-only identifiers
FR-005: PR contains only .t27 files - MET
- Bee's work is only .t27 file modifications
- docs/now/ entry was added by tools/queen/publish.py (publisher tool), not by hand
FR-006: Write t27b-blog: +N <spec paths> in PR body - NOT MET
- PR body says "A bee's work on #6481" but lacks required format
t27b-blog: +N <spec paths> - docs/now/ entry also lacks required format
Red Checks Analysis
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) - DISCOUNTED
- Failure on master: "queued"
- This is about type name conflict (Rng), unrelated to bee's test block additions
emit-bitexact - BLOCKING
- New failure introduced by this head: "1 spec(s) newly do not generate"
- Failing spec:
specs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27 - This file was NOT modified by the bee, yet the bee's change to 7 other specs caused it to fail to generate
- Evidence: brief.md log shows this is a NEW failure not present on master
spec-guards - DISCOUNTED
- Failure on master: "queued"
- 5 pre-existing function differences (f32_to_gf16, f32_to_ternary, gf16_to_f32, quantize_value, ternary_to_f32)
- Not caused by bee's test block additions
cli-tri - DISCOUNTED
- Failure on master: "queued"
- Same test skip exists on master
- Census moved 291→292 (expected increase from adding test blocks to 7 specs)
Base branch was modified
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Closes #6481
Written by a bee on
queen-6481and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code