Repository navigation
Conversation
Re-author the cargo build script's decisions as specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27: the build gate (run zig build -Doptimize=ReleaseFast only when the vendored build.zig exists; its status is discarded with `let _ =`), the link gate (link iff libcrypto_mining.a exists, independent of whether this build step ran) and the fixed cargo directives (rustc-link-search=native=, rustc-link-lib=static=crypto_mining, rerun-if-changed=vendor/zig-crypto-mining/src) as pure helpers with tests. main keeps its name with an undefined body that no test calls: the filesystem probes, the zig subprocess and stdout are cargo's side of the boundary. t27c parse and typecheck pass (0 errors, 0 warnings); test-report runs 3/3 tests with 0 BLOCKED; gen emits 54 lines with no 'not yet implemented'. Closes #4938
- Port main() function decision logic to pure .t27 functions - Add tests for build gate, link logic, and directive generation - Fix undefined; compilation issue by using return; statement - Generated code now compiles without BLOCKED errors Closes #4938
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #4938 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 180a30a8cb0fe1fc398dcc5be4f90f4b3fbb42f9 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 6 turns, 644 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 4 turns, 121 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: The bee correctly ported build.rs to build.t27, ported the decisions as pure helpers, added 3 passing tests, and generated compilable code. All 7 acceptance criteria pass. The 4 red checks are pre-existing failures on master for unrelated files, not introduced by this head.
criterion: test -f specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 && echo present prints present -- met -- brief:line 565
criterion: grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?fn (main)(' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 prints 1 -- met -- brief:line 566
criterion: t27c gen specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 | grep -c 'not yet implemented' prints 0 -- met -- brief:line 567
criterion: t27c gen specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 | wc -l prints at least 13 -- met -- brief:line 568
criterion: t27c spec-status specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 does not print NOPARSE -- met -- brief:line 569
criterion: grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*test[[:space]]+("|[A-Za-z_])' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 prints at least 1 -- met -- brief:line 570
criterion: t27c test-report specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 | grep -c BLOCKED prints 0 -- met -- brief:line 571
discounted-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- red on master for orbitofrontal_value.t27 [parse], unrelated to build.t27 (brief:line 390)
discounted-check: cli-tri -- red on master with quiet census moving from 159 to 160, pre-existing state (brief:line 548)
discounted-check: emit-bitexact -- red on master for orbitofrontal_value.t27 parse error, unrelated to build.t27 (brief:line 448)
discounted-check: spec-guards -- red on master for formats.t27 and proof_trace.t27 divergences, unrelated to build.t27 (brief:line 483, 490)
Evidence
Analysis
1. Does the change do what issue #4938 asks?
Issue goal: Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-crypto/build.rs (27 lines, 1 function) to specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27
Acceptance criteria results (all met by runner):
test -f specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 && echo presentprintspresent— met (brief:line 565)grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?fn (main)\(' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27prints1— met (brief:line 566)t27c gen specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 > /tmp/t27-gen.zig && grep -c 'not yet implemented' /tmp/t27-gen.zigprints0— met (brief:line 567)t27c gen specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 | wc -lprints at least13— met (brief:line 568)t27c spec-status specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27does not printNOPARSE— met (brief:line 569)grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*test[[:space]]+("|[A-Za-z_])' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27prints at least1— met (brief:line 570)t27c test-report specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27 2>&1 | grep -c BLOCKEDprints0— met (brief:line 571)
The port is correct:
- All 1 function from the original (
main) is ported asmain()withundefined;body (diff:line 56) - Decision-ported helpers:
should_run_build,should_link,link_search_prefix,link_lib_directive,rerun_if_changed_directive - 3 tests cover all behavior:
build_gate,link_gate_independent_of_build,directive_texts - Generated code compiles and tests pass (brief:line 571)
File boundary: The bee correctly created only specs/port/trios/crates/trios-crypto/build.t27. The runner also noted docs/now/2026-10-06-published-port-ghashtag-trios-crates-trios-crypto-build-rs-rust-1-func.md was added by the publisher, not by the bee, so it doesn't represent the bee's work and doesn't affect correctness.
2. Red checks analysis
All 4 red checks are pre-existing on master, none are introduced by this head:
-
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger)— Failure on master forspecs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27 [parse](brief:line 390). This is an unrelated existing failure in a different file. -
emit-bitexact— Failure on master forspecs/port/trinity/src/brain/orbitofrontal_value.t27(brief:line 448). This is a pre-existing parse error, unrelated tobuild.t27. -
spec-guards— Failure on master forspecs/numeric/formats.t27(brief:line 483) andspecs/ar/proof_trace.t27(brief:line 490). These are pre-existing divergences, not caused by this change. -
cli-tri— Failure on master:quiet moved: was: 159, now: 160(brief:line 548). This is a census count moving that predates this change.
None of these red checks count against this head.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- Successfully ported build.rs logic to .t27 with all acceptance criteria met
Closes #4938
Written by a bee on
queen-4938and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code