Repository navigation
Port scripts/fpga/flash.sh (Shell, 8 functions) to specs/port/scripts/fpga/flash.t27 - #6724
Conversation
- Ported 8 functions from shell script to .t27 - Added 13 test blocks covering all decision logic - Functions that interact with external world have empty bodies - Pure decision logic implemented for usage, check_bitstream, and main Closes #6389
- Port 8 functions from shell script to t27 - Add 9 test cases covering the logic - External interactions left as undefined bodies - Generated code compiles and all tests pass Closes #6389
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6389 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head af4aefb785545f66cba8470c8e0bdb1d33a3cbba (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 4 turns, 124 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 4 turns, 89 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: Ports all 8 flash.sh functions to flash.t27 with tests, passes all criteria
criterion: "Tests run without BLOCKED" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:586
discounted-check: spec-guards -- does not count against this head, it's a pre-existing master failure in specs/numeric/formats.t27 (different file) not touched by this PR, verified by brief.md:528 and brief.md:548-556</arg_value></tool_call>
Evidence
Evidence against acceptance criteria:
- No edits outside boundary files (only the two files listed in "Changed files" section of brief.md)
- No hand edits under gen/ or deleted tests
- No weakened assertions (tests are comprehensive)
- No non-ASCII identifiers
- No secrets
- The spec correctly captures the original's decision logic, not just plumbing
Defects introduced by this head:
- None. The PR adds new files that generate correctly, parse correctly, and run all tests without blocking.
Issue compliance:
- The issue explicitly states boundary:
specs/port/scripts/fpga/flash.t27 - The issue states: "Write this one file and nothing else"
- The brief.md's "Changed files" confirms exactly these two files (docs/now entry + boundary file)
- The docs/now entry is a publisher-generated coordination entry (not a bee attempt to work in repo)
- It documents what was published from
queen-6389, closing #6389 - It does not modify any code, add test cases, or change behavior
- The bee's actual work (flash.t27) is sound and passes all tests
Summary: The change correctly ports the 8 functions from scripts/fpga/flash.sh to specs/port/scripts/fpga/flash.t27 with proper tests, generates without errors, and everything else is publisher metadata. The red check is a pre-existing master failure in a different file.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- Successfully ported scripts/fpga/flash.sh (8 functions) to specs/port/scripts/fpga/flash.t27 with all acceptance criteria met
t27-bees
Bot
added
the
bee-reviewed
2 participants
Closes #6389
Written by a bee on
queen-6389and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code