Wave reports name deliverables that exist in no source file: ExprAddressOf and has_cycle_dfs each live only in the repor - #6757
Conversation
Erratum (#5406): Add erratum lines to both WAVE_LOOP_51_REPORT.md and WAVE_LOOP_45_REPORT.md documenting deliverables that were claimed as complete but never implemented in source code. - W51: ExprAddressOf and t27c lint --ascii identifiers absent from source - W45: has_cycle_dfs identifier absent from source Closes #5406
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5406 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 39822371225096e22214c6cdcbaa209fc8b5b19d (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 5 turns, 111 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 5 turns, 158 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: Erratum lines correctly added to both reports for identifiers missing from source; original report text preserved; all success criteria met
criterion: FR-001: meets -- evidence: docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_51_REPORT.md:3; docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_45_REPORT.md:2
criterion: FR-002: meets -- evidence: diff hunk:18-24 (line 24 added, line 2 exists)
criterion: FR-003: meets -- evidence: no changes to specs/policy/own_language.t27
criterion: Success criterion - grep returns 1 for W51 erratum count -- met -- evidence: brief.md:196
criterion: Success criterion - grep returns 1 for W45 erratum count -- met -- evidence: brief.md:197
criterion: Success criterion - grep returns 1 for ExprAddressOf in W51 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:198
criterion: Success criterion - grep returns 1 for has_cycle_dfs in W45 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:199
Evidence
Based on my analysis of the brief and the diff, here's my evaluation:
Issue Analysis
Issue #5406 Goal: Add erratum lines to wave reports that name deliverables (ExprAddressOf in W51, has_cycle_dfs in W45) that exist only in the report and not in source files.
Acceptance Criteria
-
FR-001: Each report must gain an
Erratum (#5406):line naming absent identifiers- W51:
ExprAddressOf,t27c lint --ascii - W45:
has_cycle_dfs - ✅ MET — Both reports have the erratum lines
- W51:
-
FR-002: Original report text must stay; erratum added, not substituted
- ✅ MET — Erratum lines are appended after title, original text preserved
-
FR-003: Must NOT add/modify non-t27 hand-written code (specs/policy/own_language.t27)
- ✅ MET — No changes to those files; only docs/now/ entry (published by CI, not bee's hand edit)
Success Criteria
All four success criteria are met per runner output:
grep -c '^Erratum (#5406):' docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_51_REPORT.md→1✅grep -c '^Erratum (#5406):' docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_45_REPORT.md→1✅grep '^Erratum (#5406):' docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_51_REPORT.md | grep -c ExprAddressOf→1✅grep '^Erratum (#5406):' docs/reports/WAVE_LOOP_45_REPORT.md | grep -c has_cycle_dfs→1✅
Red Checks
None — all non-required checks are green per brief.
Additional Observations
The PR adds a docs/now/2026-10-06-published-wave-reports-name-deliverables-that-exist-in-no-source-file-.md entry. This file documents the PR's published work but does not establish correctness; it's created by the publisher tool, not the bee's hand edit. The content correctly notes that the bee's change names two files (the two reports) and that 2 files changed with 4 insertions.
No hand edits under gen/: Only two report files modified, no generated files.
No deletions of tests: All tests remain.
No weakened assertions: No test assertions modified.
No non-ASCII identifiers: No code changes.
No secrets: No secrets present.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- Correctly adds erratum lines to wave reports naming missing deliverables
t27-bees
Bot
added
the
bee-reviewed
2 participants
Closes #5406
Written by a bee on
queen-5406and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code