Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src/lib.rs (Rust, 6 functions) to specs/port/trios/crates/trio - #5855
Conversation
Ports crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src/lib.rs (130 lines at 8b229e9489ee) to specs/port/trios/crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/ src/lib.t27, so the ring is generated from the spec instead of hand-written Rust. Roadmap stage 6 of 9 (goal #4548). Carried as code: the per-variant stable slug (LaneScarabType_slug, original line 30), the markdown bullet (LaneScarabType_as_markdown, line 39), the variant declaration order (LaneScarabType_all, line 44), the exact strings both fmt::Display impls render (LaneScarabType_fmt, line 54; LaneScarab_fmt, line 83), and the SR-00 Term pair LaneScarab::new binds (LaneScarab_new, line 73). Left out deliberately: the fmt::Formatter writes themselves (lines 53-57 and 82-86) -- I/O boundary, with every rendered string returned by a ported function and asserted by a test; the serde derive with its JSON round trip (line 123) -- wire I/O with no decision inside. The format! compositions are unrolled per variant because t27 has no string concatenation. The SR-00 Term pair is declared locally with the two variants the logic reads; cross-module use of the SR-00 sibling's spec does not resolve yet. Seven test blocks assert the original's behaviour: three variants in declaration order, pairwise-distinct slugs, display == slug, markdown bullets, the carried Term pair, new carrying the kind for every variant (standing in for the serde round trip), and the LaneScarab display text. t27c parse and typecheck pass with 0 errors; t27c test-report runs 7/7 pass, 0 FAIL, 0 BLOCKED; t27c gen emits 113 lines with no "not yet implemented". spec-status: IMPLEMENTED. Closes #5845
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5845 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head df7e41f0fab0c67959a8badfa4278674ed67d967 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 3 turns, 26 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: The spec ports all 6 functions and passes all 7 acceptance criteria. However, the docs/now/ entry has an incorrect first line that must be fixed.
criterion: 1. file exists -- met -- evidence: brief.md:673
criterion: 2. 6 functions ported -- met -- evidence: brief.md:674
criterion: 3. generates without "not yet implemented" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:675
criterion: 4. generates meaningful output -- met -- evidence: brief.md:676
criterion: 5. parses (no NOPARSE) -- met -- evidence: brief.md:677
criterion: 6. at least 6 tests -- met -- evidence: brief.md:678
criterion: 7. tests compile and run -- met -- evidence: brief.md:679
discounted-check: emit-bitexact -- FAILURE on master (specs/xilinx7/packets.t27 parse error at line 137: KwVar) unrelated to this port
discounted-check: spec-guards -- FAILURE on master (conflicts in ring-092, ring-096, ring-097) unrelated to this port
blocking-check: check -- FAILURE: docs/now/ entry first line is incorrect (should be # NOW -- Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src/lib.rs (Rust, 6 functions) (2026-10-04) but is # NOW -- Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src)
Evidence
Analysis
1. Does the change do what issue #5845 asks?
Acceptance criteria verification:
- Criterion: File exists - The runner confirms
test -fprintspresent(line 673) - Criterion: 6 functions ported - Runner confirms
grepprints6(line 674) - Criterion: Generates without "not yet implemented" - Runner confirms
grep -cprints0(line 675) - Criterion: Generates meaningful output - Runner confirms
wc -lprints113≥ 13 (line 676) - Criterion: Parses (no NOPARSE) - Runner confirms
spec-statusprintsIMPLEMENTED(line 677) - Criterion: At least 6 tests - Runner confirms
grepprints7(line 678) - Criterion: Tests compile and run - Runner confirms
grep -c BLOCKEDprints0(line 679)
All 7 acceptance criteria pass. The port:
- Ported all 6 required functions under their exact names
- Added 7 tests that all pass (covers slug, markdown, all variants, Display impls, term pair)
- Generates valid Zig without
not yet implementedplaceholders - Parses correctly (no
NOPARSE) - All generated tests compile and run successfully
No edits outside the boundary: The diff shows exactly one spec file (specs/port/trios/crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src/lib.t27) and the auto-generated docs/now/ entry. No hand edits in gen/, no deleted tests, no weakened assertions, no non-ASCII identifiers, no secrets, no spec that no longer says what its tests check.
2. Red checks
The brief lists 4 red checks. The bee has no control over 3 of them (corpus ratchet, emit-bitexact, spec-guards) which are unrelated to this port:
- Corpus ratchet (FAILURE on master): New type conflicts unrelated to this change (CounterState, LRUCache, etc.)
- emit-bitexact (FAILURE on master):
specs/xilinx7/packets.t27has a parse error (Unexpected token in expression: KwVar ('var')at line 137), unrelated to this SR-01 port - spec-guards (FAILURE on master): Conflicts in other rings (
ring-092,ring-096,ring-097), unrelated to this port
1 red check counts against this head:
- check (FAILURE): The docs/now/ entry fails its shape check
- The entry exists (line 1-18 of diff), but it has an incorrect first line:
# NOW -- Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/srcinstead of# NOW -- Port gHashTag/trios:crates/trios-scarab-types/rings/SR-01/src/lib.rs (Rust, 6 functions) (2026-10-04) - This entry is auto-generated by the publisher (
tools/queen/publish.py) per the PR body: "The second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about." - The brief correctly notes: "This entry is written by the publisher, not by the bee. A pull request must add exactly one
docs/now/entry and a bee has no way to know that" - However, the bee should verify the entry is correct. The first line is wrong and must be fixed for the PR to be valid.
- The entry exists (line 1-18 of diff), but it has an incorrect first line:
BLOCKING CHECK: check -- the docs/now/ entry has an incorrect first line (shortened filename instead of full src/lib.rs (Rust, 6 functions) (2026-10-04))
2 participants
Closes #5845
Written by a bee on
queen-5845and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code