[Planeshifter]

Addresses the JSDoc lint regression observed in #16346.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• restores settings.jsdoc.contexts and settings.jsdoc.tagNamePreference in the base JavaScript flat configuration.
• preserves the project's preference for @constructor over @class, fixing the jsdoc/check-tag-names error on existing constructor documentation.

These settings were present in the legacy configuration at commit fd16a2f49cc, which introduced them in #10965. They were omitted when #10973 switched JavaScript linting to flat configuration.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• fix: avoid mutating source array #16346: the failed lint job reports the regression on an existing @constructor annotation.
• build: switch Makefiles and pre-commit to flat config (gh54 part VII) #10973: migration to flat configuration.
• build: migrate JSDoc linting off removed core rules #10965: introduction of the original shared JSDoc settings.

Reference Packages

Did the content of this pull request follow one or more existing packages? Answering is optional.

This pull request followed these packages:

• No package reference; this restores the existing configuration in etc/eslint/.eslintrc.js at fd16a2f49cc.

What carried over from the reference(s)?

• The complete settings.jsdoc block, including all five contexts and the class: 'constructor' tag preference.

What differed, or what did you have to work out yourself?

• The settings are applied within the base JavaScript entry in eslint.config.js, preserving inheritance by the Markdown code-block configuration.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

Validation:

• Confirmed the restored settings exactly match the legacy configuration.
• Linted array/fixed-endian-factory/lib/main.js and eslint.config.js: zero errors; one existing stdlib/no-single-property-require warning on the config's path import.
• Verified a focused reproducer rejects @constructor without the settings, accepts it with the settings, and continues to flag @class.
• Confirmed the Markdown code-block configuration inherits the restored settings.
• git diff --check, normal pre-commit checks, and the pre-push dependency license check passed.
• Used EC_VERSION=v3.11.3 locally because the installed EditorConfig downloader does not recognize the latest release's renamed macOS binary assets.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

• Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
• Test/benchmark generation
• Documentation (including examples)
• Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

This PR was written primarily by OpenAI Codex under human direction, including investigation, implementation, validation, and the PR description.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[kgryte]

@Planeshifter We've now a few of these situations where the previous settings were not carried over. Would you mind taking a closer look at the other previous overrides we had and making sure we have 1:1 parity?