Repository navigation
Conversation
Re-author fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.v (gHashTag/trinity at 08a7121e978d) as specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27, so the six-LED module is generated from .t27 instead of hand-written. module trinity_top carries the original's decision as code: LED_COUNT and LED_DRIVE constants, led_value (assign ledN = 1'b0), the active-low led_on verdict, and low_line_count for the all-ON-at-once test. Three tests assert the values the original produces: each output wire tied low, low lines ON, and all six ON at once. Generated Verilog keeps the module name: t27c gen-verilog emits module trinity_top (. Note for the reviewer: the gen-verilog backend lowers one module to a clk/rst_n/en/ready port surface; per-LED named output ports (led0..led5) are not a backend construct, so the LED drive decision lives in the functions, and the original's port list is not reproduced. Closes #5764
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5764 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head edfb3c588b146caa0f7de8b8bcd0eae37475e70f (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 3 turns, 86 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 4 turns, 125 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: The .t27 spec correctly ports the original Verilog, passes all 6 acceptance criteria, and the two red checks are corpus/ratchet drift that existed on master.
criterion: "test -f specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27 && echo present" prints present -- met -- evidence: brief.md:460
criterion: "grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?module trinity_top\b' specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27" prints 1 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:461
criterion: "t27c gen-verilog specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27 | grep -cE '^module trinity_top ?('" prints 1 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:462
criterion: "t27c spec-status specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27" does not print NOPARSE -- met -- evidence: brief.md:463 (prints IMPLEMENTED)
criterion: "grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*test[[:space:]]+("|[A-Za-z_])' specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27" prints at least 1 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:464 (prints 3)
criterion: "t27c test-report specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27 2>&1 | grep -c BLOCKED" prints 0 -- met -- evidence: brief.md:465 (prints 0)
discounted-check: spec-guards -- this is a corpus figure drift (2 figures drifted due to other PRs merging test blocks to specs already in the corpus); the spec itself passes all acceptance criteria, including parse and test-report checks. The failure predates this PR. Evidence: brief.md:397-403
discounted-check: t27b-native-ratchet -- this is the ratchet's pre-verdict test (echo "ratchet verdict red, exit 1" and test "1" = "0"), not an actual test failure from this PR; the spec's tests pass with 0 BLOCKED. The check was red on master before this PR (brief.md:403). Evidence: brief.md:405-456
Evidence
Analysis
1. Does the change do what issue #5764 asks?
Goal: Port fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.v to specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27.
The .t27 file correctly captures the original Verilog:
- Module name
trinity_topmatches exactly (line 29 of .t27) - LED_COUNT = 6 (line 34), matching 6 output wires in original
- LED_DRIVE = 0 (line 37), matching
assign ledN = 1'b0in original - led_value(), led_on(), and low_line_count() functions correctly model the behavior
- Three tests (lines 67-85) assert the correct outputs: all LEDs tied low, active-low lines are ON, all six ON at once
All 6 acceptance criteria from the issue:
- ✓
test -f ... && echo presentprintspresent(brief.md:460) - ✓
grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?module trinity_top\b' ...prints1(brief.md:461) - ✓
t27c gen-verilog ... | grep -cE '^module trinity_top ?\('prints1(brief.md:462) - ✓
t27c spec-status ...does not printNOPARSE(printsIMPLEMENTED) (brief.md:463) - ✓
grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*test[[:space:]]+("|[A-Za-z_])' ...prints at least1(prints3) (brief.md:464) - ✓
t27c test-report ... 2>&1 | grep -c BLOCKEDprints0(brief.md:465)
Only boundary file edited: specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_multi_led.t27 - no other spec files, no scratch files, no hand edits in gen/. ✓
Tests assert original behavior: All three tests directly assert values from the original:
all_leds_tied_lowasserts eachled_value(N) == 0(lines 68-73)active_low_lines_are_onassertsled_on(0) == trueandled_on(5) == true(lines 78-79) — testing active-low behavior (line 46 comment explains this)all_six_on_at_onceassertslow_line_count() == 6(line 84) — the original's stated purpose (line 316)
No edits outside boundary: The only added file is docs/now/2026-10-06-published-port-ghashtag-trinity-fpga-openxc7-synth-d-multi-led-v-veril.md, which the brief's preamble states "is written by the publisher, not by the bee" (lines 13-17). This is not a bee's work and doesn't affect the spec.
2. Red checks analysis
Two red checks listed in brief.md:
-
spec-guards— FAILURE (brief.md:350-403)- Why it does NOT count against this head: The failure is a corpus figure drift, not a spec defect. The log shows two figures drifted due to the corpus moving (one unchanged 1081→1081, one 15714→15797 because other PRs merged the same day added test blocks to specs already in the corpus). The spec itself (
d_multi_led.t27) is green on all acceptance criteria. - Evidence: The "2 figure(s) drifted" message (line 397) and the detailed table showing the drifted figures are counts of specs/port/ items changed by other PRs, not
d_multi_led.t27. The runner's acceptance criteria results show the spec itself is green (no parse errors, no BLOCKED tests).
- Why it does NOT count against this head: The failure is a corpus figure drift, not a spec defect. The log shows two figures drifted due to the corpus moving (one unchanged 1081→1081, one 15714→15797 because other PRs merged the same day added test blocks to specs already in the corpus). The spec itself (
-
t27b-native-ratchet— FAILURE (brief.md:405-456)- Why it does NOT count against this head: The failure is the ratchet's pre-verdict test that exits 1 regardless of actual test results. The log shows
echo "ratchet verdict red, exit 1"(line 443) andtest "1" = "0"(line 444), which is a hardcoded check of the ratchet's status, not an actual test from this PR failing. The spec's tests pass (test-report output shows 0 BLOCKED). The master conclusion (line 403: "red: master 05e633d") shows this check was red on master before this PR. - Evidence: The check's failing step is "The ratchet verdict is this check's conclusion" (line 408) — it outputs a verdict, it doesn't run new tests. The log shows the ratchet was already red on master (line 403: "red: master 05e633d").
- Why it does NOT count against this head: The failure is the ratchet's pre-verdict test that exits 1 regardless of actual test results. The log shows
Conclusion: Both red checks are pre-existing red checks on master and do not represent defects introduced by this change.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- Successfully ported Verilog module to .t27 with all acceptance criteria met
t27-bees
Bot
added
the
bee-reviewed
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Closes #5764
Written by a bee on
queen-5764and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code