Should the patronymic view read Kazakh -ұлы/-қызы written as one word? (Тилектес Серикбайулы АДАМБЕКОВ gives patronymic '') #1188

Kazakh writes a patronymic as one word, the father's name plus -ұлы ("son of") or -қызы ("daughter of"): Тілектес Серікбайұлы АДАМБЕКОВ. Russian-language records spell it -улы/-кызы (Серикбайулы). Neither pack's patronymic test reads it: RU matches Russian endings (-ович, -евна), and TR_AZ matches only a marker written as its own word. Measured on master ccaf6ad, with the roles right by position under every setting:

The same senator appears both ways in the source, Базарбаевич in Russian and Базарбайұлы in Kazakh.

Measured (2026-11-08) on Kazakhstan's Mazhilis and Senate (OpenSanctions kz_mazhilis, kz_senate, 145 members): of the 94 three-word names, 70 write a Russian-style patronymic and 19 the Kazakh one. Counting the Kazakh-language spellings the datasets give as aliases, 83 spellings hold -ұлы/-улы/-қызы.

A smaller case of the same gap: Russian patronymics in Azerbaijani spelling, -oviç and -yeviç (ZABELİN Mixail Yuryeviç), 2 of Azerbaijan's 124 deputies (OpenSanctions az_parliament). The Latin endings list -ovich only.

Questions

• Should the patronymic view read -ұлы/-улы/-қызы written as one word, and under which choice: RU (the records are Russian-format), a Kazakh pack, or TR_AZ?
• The collision: since the 1990s some Kazakhs use a -ұлы form as their surname (Қасымұлы). A word with the ending in the family position would then fill the patronymic view wrongly, much as an -ович surname does under O1 (Should O1's rotation skip a name that opens with an initial? (И. Б. Зубкевич gives family И. under locales.RU) #1185).
• Add -oviç/-yeviç/-ovna to the Latin East Slavic endings, or treat Azerbaijani spellings of Russian patronymics as out of scope?