Repository navigation
docs(docs): fifth whole-repo pass over the non-API docs, with issue/PR roles (#1103) - #2161
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
GOOD TO GO at
|
Merged
5 tasks done
Contributor
|
Coverage: 91.55% (unit tier, Python 3.15,
Per-file detail: the |
5 tasks done
Owner
Author
|
Ready to merge at
|
…R roles (#1103) - Cite issues and pull requests by :issue:/:pr: in rendered text: the hand-written GitHub links in workflows.rst, releasing.rst and pep.rst, the bare #NNN in workflows.rst, and the #NNN in pcapkit docstrings and #: comments. #2050, linked as an issue, is a pull request. - Add tests/project/test_docs_issue_pr_roles_1103_unit.py, which fails on a hand-written link or bare #NNN in .rst pages, docstrings and #: comments; its allowlist holds only the references other tests pin. - Record the rule on the documentation conventions page. - Name the external action functions releasing.rst and workflows.rst cited by line, where no test pins the line. - Fix stale claims: the shared changelog pull request has merged, the Windows leg runs leg_summary.py and pip_install.py, Lint expects pylint's import-error rather than tracking a count, pypcapfile fails from 3.12 up rather than working only on 3.10 and 3.11, cryptography in the all extra is no pure-Python wheel; drop "today", "this change" and "current". Docs build: no warnings, and the same 116 under -n as origin/main.
Owner
Author
|
Rebased onto
The patch changed in that hunk, so CI runs again. A short delta check is running. |
JarryShaw
force-pushed
the
docs/1103-r5-docs
branch
from
October 25, 2026 14:15
3dcd2f3 to
ac32f42
Compare
5 tasks done
Owner
Author
|
Review: GOOD TO GO at |
Owner
Author
|
Ready to merge at
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
make testpasses, and a test case covers the changeWhat is the purpose of your pull request?
docs— documentation onlyDescription
Part of #1103 round 5. This is the non-API docs slice, and it also converts issue/PR reference syntax across the repo, as the owner asked on #1103. Base is
main4c3d30163.:issue:/:pr:, in Sphinx-rendered text only.workflows.rst85,releasing.rst24,pep.rst4, and 21 inpcapkit/docstrings and#:comments.#comments keep#NNN. Links to Discussions and to other repos keep their URLs.tests/project/test_docs_issue_pr_roles_1103_unit.py.#NNNin rendered text.mainit finds 131 violations beyond the 8 allowlisted entries, 139 in all; here it finds only the allowlisted ones.conventions/documentation.rst.(#1962)each have a reason in the allowlist. A follow-up changes those pins and drops the entries together.process.rst: the shared changelog PR merged on 2026-10-01, and Lint'simport-errorexpectation.workflows.rst: the script table now coversexperimental.yml'swindowsjob.pep.rst: pypcapfile fails from 3.12 up.index.rst:cryptographyisn't pure Python.ext.rstsample.-n; with-n, the same 116 asmain, all on API pages..pyfiles.