Skip to content

Fix thread counts on 23 Hyper-Threaded Atoms from #254 - #264

Merged
Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/atom-ht-threads
Sep 25, 2026
Merged

Seungpyo1007 merged 1 commit into
developfrom
fix/atom-ht-threads

Conversation

@Seungpyo1007

@Seungpyo1007 Seungpyo1007 commented Sep 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Follow-up to #254. The Atom tables on List of Intel Atom processors have only a "Cores" column, and the import copied the core count into threads. That's right for the Silvermont, Goldmont and Tremont families, which have no Hyper-Threading. It halves the thread count for the Bonnell/Saltwell families, whose sections on the same page say every model supports Hyper-Threading.

Family Records Change
Tunnel Creek (E6xx) 8 1C/1T → 1C/2T
Stellarton (E6x5C) 6 1C/1T → 1C/2T
Lincroft (Z650) 1 1C/1T → 1C/2T
Centerton (S1220, S1240) 2 2C/2T → 2C/4T
Briarwood (S1269, S1279, S1289) 3 2C/2T → 2C/4T
Cloverview (Z2520, Z2560, Z2580) 3 2C/2T → 2C/4T

Only threads changes. Root-cause parser fix: GetTechAPI/TechEngine#91 (a bare core count now leaves threads unknown instead of guessing).

Closes #1

…n, Lincroft, Centerton, Briarwood, Cloverview)

The Atom list tables only give a core count and the import copied it into
threads. The same page states every model in these six families supports
Hyper-Threading, so threads = 2 x cores.
@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔎 Data verification — Tier 0 (offline existence/trust)

Scored by app.verify; posted by TechEngineBot. Informational only — the structural gate (app.validate) is separate and authoritative for merge.

Changed records in this PR

406 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 395
    "Yellow" : 11
    "Red" : 0
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
brand 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 13 7 6 0 53.8%
smartphone 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 38 37 1 0 97.4%
tablet 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨 10 7 3 0 70.0%
watch 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 4 4 0 0 100.0%
pda 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 1 1 0 0 100.0%
gpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 75 74 1 0 98.7%
cpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 265 265 0 0 100.0%
All 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨 406 395 11 0 97.3%

Full-dataset baseline

106101 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 23901
    "Yellow" : 81104
    "Red" : 1096
Loading
Category Distribution Total 🟢 🟡 🔴 🟢 %
brand 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 207 122 85 0 58.9%
soc 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 2077 231 824 1022 11.1%
smartphone 🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 93396 17931 75397 68 19.2%
tablet 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 3455 291 3163 1 8.4%
watch 🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 433 43 386 4 9.9%
pda 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 140 83 57 0 59.3%
gpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨 2093 1274 819 0 60.9%
cpu 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟥 4300 3926 373 1 91.3%
All 🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥 106101 23901 81104 1096 22.5%

Hard violations (forced red):

Count Check
1 !boost_ge_base

green = authoritative source + complete + consistent · yellow = plausible, needs confirmation · red = sparse/weak source or a hard contradiction. Promotion to verified runs in the scheduled verify-network workflow.

@Seungpyo1007
Seungpyo1007 merged commit dc42659 into develop Sep 25, 2026
5 checks passed
@Seungpyo1007
Seungpyo1007 deleted the fix/atom-ht-threads branch September 25, 2026 06:11
@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine change review: FAIL

Check Result
python -m app.validate FAIL
New hard integrity anomalies vs PR base PASS

Changed data

Category Added Modified Deleted Added verified Added unverified Added Kaggle-sourced
brand 0 0 0 0 0 0
soc 0 0 0 0 0 0
smartphone 0 0 0 0 0 0
tablet 0 0 0 0 0 0
watch 0 0 0 0 0 0
pda 0 0 0 0 0 0
gpu 0 0 0 0 0 0
cpu 0 23 0 0 0 0

Changed record examples

cpu modified

  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e620.json - Intel Atom E620
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e620t.json - Intel Atom E620T
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e625c.json - Intel Atom E625C
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e625ct.json - Intel Atom E625CT
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e640.json - Intel Atom E640
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e640t.json - Intel Atom E640T
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e645c.json - Intel Atom E645C
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e645ct.json - Intel Atom E645CT
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e660.json - Intel Atom E660
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e660t.json - Intel Atom E660T
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e665c.json - Intel Atom E665C
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e665ct.json - Intel Atom E665CT
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e680.json - Intel Atom E680
  • cpu/intel/2010/consumer/atom-e680t.json - Intel Atom E680T
  • cpu/intel/2011/consumer/atom-z650.json - Intel Atom Z650
  • ... 8 more

Heuristic review

  • Heuristic warnings: none found.

@TechEngineBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TechEngine validation stats: FAIL

Data summary

Category Total Verified Unverified Missing verified Tracked Verified % of tracked
brand 207 122 85 0 207 58.9%
soc 2077 193 1884 0 2077 9.3%
smartphone 93396 17501 75895 0 93396 18.7%
tablet 3455 273 3182 0 3455 7.9%
watch 433 39 394 0 433 9.0%
pda 140 74 66 0 140 52.9%
gpu 2093 1028 1065 0 2093 49.1%
cpu 4300 2869 1431 0 4300 66.7%
all 106101 22099 84002 0 106101 20.8%

Warning

Tracked verified coverage is below 50% for tablet 7.9% (273/3455), watch 9.0% (39/433), soc 9.3% (193/2077), smartphone 18.7% (17501/93396), all 20.8% (22099/106101), gpu 49.1% (1028/2093).
Tracked coverage excludes records missing the verified field; see the Missing verified column for those records.
This does not fail validation. Keep imported records verified: false until manual audit, but treat this as follow-up verification work before relying on the affected categories as curated data.

Validation notes

  • The integrity gate blocks only hard anomalies introduced by this PR relative to its merge base.
  • Full advisory outlier listings are suppressed on successful runs because they are dataset-wide and mostly stable between PRs.
  • Failure runs still include a detailed log excerpt for debugging.

Key output:

## app.validate
## integrity_check.py (PR head compared with PR base)
loaded CPU=4300 GPU=2093
Integrity section Flagged lines
structural 20
CPU name/tier consistency (desktop mainstream only) 0
CPU single>multi (cinebench/geekbench — should be multi>=single) 0
CPU era-vs-score outliers 8
CPU cross-source ratio outliers (possible wrong-variant) 155
GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity 18
Detailed validation log excerpt
 [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Phi 7210': ratio=0.58
  [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Atom x5-Z8350 (Cherry Trail)': ratio=0.81
  [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-870 (Lynnfield)': ratio=0.91
  [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition (Bloomfield)': ratio=0.92
  [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-920 (Bloomfield)': ratio=0.93
  [passmark_cpu_mark/geekbench_multi] 'Loongson 3A6000': ratio=0.38
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD A10-7870K (Godavari)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX': ratio=2.1
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9554': ratio=2.19
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9654': ratio=2.41
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 7950X': ratio=1.83
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9985 (Turin refresh)': ratio=2.43
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 9970X3D': ratio=1.89
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 3 1300X': ratio=0.87
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 3 1200': ratio=0.88
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD A10-9700 (Bristol Ridge)': ratio=1.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD A10-7850K (Kaveri)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 7742': ratio=1.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X': ratio=1.92
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 3900X': ratio=1.97
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 3950X': ratio=2.07
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 3 3200G': ratio=1.01
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7980X': ratio=1.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9754': ratio=2.5
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX': ratio=1.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX': ratio=1.85
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7960X': ratio=1.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX': ratio=2.12
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9684X': ratio=2.42
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX': ratio=2.33
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D': ratio=1.94
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Athlon II X4 640 (Propus)': ratio=0.95
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9745': ratio=2.57
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9845': ratio=2.56
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9825': ratio=2.56
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX': ratio=2.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9755': ratio=2.5
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 9965': ratio=2.61
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT': ratio=0.85
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 9950X': ratio=1.91
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 9900X': ratio=1.78
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X': ratio=2.03
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9970X': ratio=2.24
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9980X': ratio=2.5
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX': ratio=2.33
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D': ratio=1.8
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D': ratio=1.88
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD EPYC 7763': ratio=2.15
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 5900': ratio=2.14
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X': ratio=2.14
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 5950X': ratio=2.37
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 9 5900X': ratio=1.91
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 7 4700GE': ratio=1.79
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G': ratio=1.84
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX': ratio=1.79
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 3 2200G': ratio=0.95
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Microsoft Azure Cobalt 100': ratio=2.17
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100': ratio=1.03
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100': ratio=0.86
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100': ratio=0.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100': ratio=0.7
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'NVIDIA Grace CPU Superchip': ratio=2.2
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Ampere AmpereOne A192-32X': ratio=2.4
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Ampere Altra Max M128-30': ratio=2.11
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-6500U (Skylake-U)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Atom Z3770 (Bay Trail)': ratio=0.9
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-4500U (Haswell-U)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-13900K': ratio=1.95
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i3-12300': ratio=0.89
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Pentium Gold G7400 (Alder Lake)': ratio=0.99
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon 6781P (Granite Rapids refresh)': ratio=2.68
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon 6781E (Clearwater Forest)': ratio=2.42
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 (Skylake-SP)': ratio=1.82
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-7500U (Kaby Lake-U)': ratio=1.02
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Pentium G4560 (Kaby Lake)': ratio=1.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Pentium G3258 Anniversary Edition (Haswell)': ratio=0.89
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-5500U (Broadwell-U)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon W-3175X': ratio=1.79
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8280': ratio=1.81
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake-U)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8452Y': ratio=5.48
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon w9-3495X': ratio=2.16
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon CPU Max 9462': ratio=2.08
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8480+': ratio=2.22
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon w9-3475X': ratio=2.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon CPU Max 9470': ratio=2.21
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon CPU Max 9480': ratio=2.23
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+': ratio=2.26
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon CPU Max 9460': ratio=2.15
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon CPU Max 9468': ratio=2.19
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Gold 6448H (Sapphire Rapids)': ratio=2.05
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Processor N97': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-14900K': ratio=2.02
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-13980HX': ratio=1.78
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Processor N50': ratio=0.93
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-14700KF': ratio=1.83
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 7 155U': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 5 135U': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-13900KS': ratio=1.96
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-14700K': ratio=1.86
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Processor N200': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i3-13100': ratio=0.9
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Processor N100': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i5-2500K (Sandy Bridge)': ratio=1.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Atom x5-Z8350 (Cherry Trail)': ratio=0.86
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon 6980P': ratio=2.6
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon 6780E': ratio=2.64
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon 6960P (Granite Rapids)': ratio=2.42
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-14900HX': ratio=1.84
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 9 285K': ratio=1.84
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i9-14900KS': ratio=1.93
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 9 285': ratio=1.89
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 7 268V': ratio=0.83
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 9 285KF': ratio=1.84
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-14700': ratio=1.81
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 7 265F': ratio=1.82
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i3-14100': ratio=0.9
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 5 228V': ratio=0.82
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon w9-3595X (Emerald Rapids-WS)': ratio=2.19
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX': ratio=1.84
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Platinum 8380': ratio=1.95
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon W-3375': ratio=2.17
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Xeon Gold 6338 (Ice Lake-SP)': ratio=1.88
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i5-750 (Lynnfield)': ratio=1.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Pentium Gold G6400 (Comet Lake)': ratio=1.04
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Celeron G5905 (Comet Lake)': ratio=0.88
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Intel Core i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R)': ratio=1.0
  [cinebench_r23_multi/geekbench_multi] 'Loongson 3A6000': ratio=1.03
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'AMD Ryzen 5 5500GT': ratio=0.09
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100': ratio=0.07
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100': ratio=0.09
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Intel Xeon W-3175X': ratio=0.07
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Intel Core i9-10920X': ratio=0.04
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Intel Core i9-13900F': ratio=0.04
  [cinebench_2024_multi/cinebench_r23_multi] 'Intel Core i9-10900K': ratio=0.09

### GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity
  [passmark_g3d_mark/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 4670': ratio=0.27
  [passmark_g3d_mark/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 5670': ratio=0.2
  [passmark_g3d_mark/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 6850': ratio=0.4
  [passmark_g3d_mark/timespy_score] 'GeForce GTS 450': ratio=5.48
  [passmark_g3d_mark/timespy_score] 'GeForce GTS 250': ratio=0.51
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 4670': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon Pro W7900': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon Pro W7800': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 5670': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 6850': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'Radeon HD 5850': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'RTX 6000 Ada Generation': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'GeForce GTS 250': ratio=0.0
  [fp32_tflops/timespy_score] 'GeForce 9600 GT': ratio=0.0
  [passmark_g3d_mark/fp32_tflops] 'L40': ratio=302.2
  [passmark_g3d_mark/fp32_tflops] 'GeForce GTX 480': ratio=6068.45
  [passmark_g3d_mark/fp32_tflops] 'GeForce GTX 465': ratio=6194.38
  [passmark_g3d_mark/fp32_tflops] 'RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition': ratio=303.69

(no lines under a section = clean)

Baseline hard anomalies: 20; PR head: 20; introduced: 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working data Dataset changes enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Massive dataset rebuild: CPU + brand + GPU + smartphone + SoC (1989-2026)

2 participants