[Superseded] perf: vectorize small u8 table take - #9567
3 benchmarks regressed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 9 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1969 untouched benchmarks
🆕 6 new benchmarks
⏩ 54 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ji/small-u8-table-take (593e136) with develop (ef43456)2
Footnotes
-
54 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
ji/small-u8-table-take-benchmark(d49393c) during the generation of this report, sodevelop(ef43456) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩