🧪 [testing improvement] Add tests for TusServletRequest - #130
Conversation
Co-authored-by: tomdesair <14034630+tomdesair@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: tomdesair <14034630+tomdesair@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: tomdesair <14034630+tomdesair@users.noreply.github.com>
…d resolve merge conflicts Co-authored-by: tomdesair <14034630+tomdesair@users.noreply.github.com>
🎯 What: The testing gap addressed: Missing test file for
TusServletRequest. CreatedTusServletRequestTestandMockServletInputStream.📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested: standard and chunked input streams, input streams with checksum calculations (both standard and chunked), processor registration, and header fallbacks.
✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage: The new tests successfully cover 100% of the modified lines (which were none since it was an addition) and significantly increases test coverage of the
TusServletRequestclass.PR created automatically by Jules for task 3677208701501500505 started by @tomdesair