🧪 [testing improvement] Add tests for TusServletRequest trailer header fallback - #129
Conversation
…r fallback Co-authored-by: tomdesair <14034630+tomdesair@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: The
TusServletRequestwas missing test coverage for thegetHeader(String name)fallback logic. Specifically, whensuper.getHeader(name)returns a blank value or null, the class is supposed to look up the value intrailerHeaders.📊 Coverage: Added test cases in
TusServletRequestTestto cover standard header retrieval, fallback totrailerHeaderswhen the header is missing, fallback totrailerHeaderswhen the header is blank, and when a header does not exist in standard or trailer headers.✨ Result: The test coverage for
TusServletRequest.javahas been improved, and the previously untested method is fully covered.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8727877931933897901 started by @tomdesair