🔗 Remove trailing slashes from Markdown links - #2701
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Normalizes external Markdown links by removing trailing slashes, consolidating cleanup previously excluded from unrelated PRs.
Changes:
- Standardizes external URLs across validator, tooling, API, analytics, and build documentation.
- Updates the contributor guide’s pnpm link.
- Leaves link destinations and referral parameters otherwise unchanged.
Recommendation: MERGE-READY — the cleanup is complete and mechanically consistent.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
docs/validators/tier-1-orgs.mdx |
Normalizes Obsrvr Radar links. |
docs/validators/admin-guide/prerequisites.mdx |
Normalizes the chrony link. |
docs/validators/admin-guide/monitoring.mdx |
Normalizes the Radar link. |
docs/validators/admin-guide/configuring.mdx |
Normalizes the Radar link. |
docs/tools/developer-tools/wallets.mdx |
Normalizes wallet-provider links. |
docs/data/apis/rpc/providers.mdx |
Normalizes the GetBlock link. |
docs/data/analytics/analytics-providers/analytics-providers.mdx |
Normalizes the commented Allium link. |
docs/build/building-with-ai.mdx |
Normalizes Stellar Skills links. |
docs/build/apps/privacy.mdx |
Normalizes privacy-demo links. |
CONTRIBUTING.md |
Normalizes the pnpm link. |
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
|
Thanks for splitting these out, John, and sorry for the mixed signal. My #2675 wording ("the standalone sweep, bundled into unrelated work") was ambiguous, you reasonably read the objection as the bundling, and Bri merging #2409 the week before muddied it further. That's on me. But it sends us back to the question I asked on #2583 and never got an answer to: is there a source for the no-trailing-slash "rule," or is it more a personal preference? So either:
Both answers make this PR unnecessary, so I'm closing it as parked rather than reviewing it. Not a rejection. Do you know where the rule originated? You're closer to this thread than I am, and if there's a real reason (SEO, redirects, something in the build) I'd rather hear it before deciding. |
Co-authored-by: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
Re: #2675 (review) (point 1) and #2672 (review)
There were a few commits after #2409 since it was three months ago. That's why I tried to merge into main in #2583.
Styles are all aligned now.