Simplify init_prepare - #267
Conversation
|
My initial thought is I'm sure I like this as it means the user would have to rebuild the filter if I like that we remove So overall happy to go with this, although maybe good to confirm with @AdrienCorenflos too as it's an API breaking change |
|
Ok, I've gone back and forth on that one, but I think this is a good change and closer to original design. I'm still not 100% sure (need to see some eventual calls) but I'm confident enough it will be the right move. |
|
Okkk let's go ahead and draft the changes required to remove |
As discussed in #266
@SamDuffield Thoughts on the changes to
init_preparefor Kalman?