test(research): lock maximal-window tie break - #120
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Post-CI final diff review completed.
No review comments, bot action items, privacy findings, or secret findings remain. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The v0.7 research matrix named maximal-window ties as an unverified policy point. Six synthetic events are sufficient to create exactly two candidates with equal covered-event count, total span, and episode count, so the final chronological key is the only distinguishing objective. A focused control gives higher decision value than another large JSON fixture.
How to validate
Risk / rollout notes
Detector::analyze(), CLI behavior,loglens.report.v3, and v0.6 behavior are unchanged.2008d8eand4d01850; no migration or runtime rollback is required.