Skip to content

Fix FAQ sample link#107

Open
JSap0914 wants to merge 1 commit into
springdoc:masterfrom
JSap0914:codex/fix-faq-sample-link
Open

Fix FAQ sample link#107
JSap0914 wants to merge 1 commit into
springdoc:masterfrom
JSap0914:codex/fix-faq-sample-link

Conversation

@JSap0914

@JSap0914 JSap0914 commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fixes the FAQ sample test link that currently points to a non-existent app68 directory.

The sample exists under the current v31 test path in springdoc-openapi, so this updates the AsciiDoc link target and visible URL to /api/v31/app68.

Fixes #106.

Evidence

  • Issue: dead link in faq #106
  • Duplicate PR check before edits: gh pr list -R springdoc/springdoc.github.io --state open --search '106 OR #106 OR faq.adoc OR app68 OR springdoc-openapi-actuator-webmvc-tests' --json number,title,url,author,headRefName,baseRefName,updatedAt returned [].
  • Current broken URL returned HTTP_STATUS=404 before the edit.
  • Updated URL returned HTTP_STATUS=200 after the edit.

Verification

  • curl -L -o /dev/null -s -w '%{http_code}' https://github.com/springdoc/springdoc-openapi/tree/main/springdoc-openapi-tests/springdoc-openapi-actuator-webmvc-tests/src/test/java/test/org/springdoc/api/v31/app68 -> 200
  • git diff --check -> passed

Full docs generation was not run in this environment because mvn is not installed, there is no mvnw wrapper in the repository, and asciidoctor is not installed.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 5, 2026 06:35

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

dead link in faq

2 participants