Add socat utility detections - #4253
Conversation
|
@codex review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 10ede786e0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| - https://hackers-arise.com/socat-the-advanced-hackers-network-tool/ | ||
| drilldown_searches: | ||
| - name: View the detection results for - "$user$" and "$host$" | ||
| search: '%original_detection_search% | search user="$user$" host="$host$"' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an analyst opens this drilldown, the detection result has dest because the tstats search groups by Processes.dest, but it never emits host; consequently $host$ is unresolved and the appended host="$host$" filter returns no matching detection results. The risk-event drilldown below has the same problem because the system risk entity is also dest, so both occurrences should use $dest$ as the companion detection already does.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
3 participants
Details
Adding detections for socat utility
###Story
MacOS Persistence Techniques
###Detections
Checklist
<platform>_<mitre att&ck technique>_<short description>nomenclature