-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 887
autobahn/evmonlyapp: prepare block n+1 while block n executes #4272
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bdchatham
wants to merge
1
commit into
devin/1789943071-stack-2-pending-overlay
from
devin/1789943071-stack-3-prepare-pipeline
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[suggestion] Two things follow from keying the prepared block on
(height, blockHash)alone.First, on a hit
req.Txsis never executed —result, and thereforeTxResults, come entirely fromprepared. That is safe only because the autobahn header hash commits topayloadHash, so(height, req.Hash)pins the tx set. Nothing in the app states that requirement, andProxy.PrepareBlockis reachable for any ABCI application; a caller whosereq.Hashdoes not commit toreq.Txs(asTestEVMOnlyApplicationIgnoresAPreparedBlockForAnotherHashconstructs by hand) would silently execute a different tx list than the one it passed.Second,
forgetSenders(req.Txs)on line 741 re-runshashRawTxsover every raw transaction in the block on the critical path, purely to evict entriespeekSendersalready looked up during preparation.One change covers both: have
PrepareBlockkeep the tx hashes it computed inpreparedBlock, then verify them against the block's txs on the hit path and use them to drop the cached senders without hashing again.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not changed here by design: this stack re-opens the already-merged code unmodified so the team can review what actually runs on giga-1 (the stack top equals current giga-1). Noted as a follow-up.