Restore the blank-line separator lost when two PRs merged - #291
Merged
Conversation
PRs #285 and #286 both appended a new test section to the end of tests/test_process_backend.py. Each was correctly formatted on its own branch, but the textual merge joined the last function of one directly to the section comment of the other with a single blank line between them, which black wants to be two. Neither PR's CI could have caught this: the defect exists only in the merge result, not in either branch. It surfaced immediately once the lint gate from #290 landed on main, which is the gate doing its job on its first run. Formatting only; no behavior change. Suite: 533 passed, 11 skipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012ebvMQ3vLxdK3joymz6Feg
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
main is currently red on the lint gate — this fixes it
PRs #285 and #286 both appended a new test section to the end of
tests/test_process_backend.py. Each was correctly formatted on its own branch, but the textual merge joined the last function of one directly to the section comment of the other with one blank line where black wants two:Neither PR's CI could have caught this — the defect exists only in the merge result, not in either branch. It surfaced the moment the lint gate from #290 landed on main, which is that gate doing its job on its first run.
Two blank lines. Formatting only, no behavior change.
Verified against current main
Generated by Claude Code