Skip to content

Make the last non-breaking box impl generalizations - #162600

Open
maxdexh wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
maxdexh:box-generalize
Open

Make the last non-breaking box impl generalizations#162600
maxdexh wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
maxdexh:box-generalize

Conversation

@maxdexh

@maxdexh maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

View all comments

Follow-up to #161946

r? clarfonthey

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 10, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 10, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

clarfonthey is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Feel free to reassign, close or whatever. Like I said I only created this PR because it was really quick to write

@clarfonthey

clarfonthey commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

(Just set capacity to 0 for rustconf. I don't mind reviewing.)

@craterbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@clarfonthey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@craterbot check

@craterbot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

🚨 Error: missing start toolchain

🆘 If you have any trouble with Crater please ask in t-infra on Zulip
ℹ️ Crater is a tool to run experiments across parts of the Rust ecosystem. Learn more

@clarfonthey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 10, 2026
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
Make the last non-breaking box impl generalizations
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 10, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 Test for b8108b0 failed: CI. Failed jobs:

@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/home/ubuntu/actions-runner/_work/_temp/8c23750a-bf19-4bb9-b479-e058e0167563.sh: line 1: git: command not found what 😂

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 10, 2026
@clarfonthey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors try

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
Make the last non-breaking box impl generalizations
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 10, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💔 Test for 5038223 failed: CI. Failed jobs:

@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

bors does not approve

@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@clarfonthey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I guess Fish is too occupied at the Foundation table at RustConf.

@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Can we have a waiting-on-git label? ^^

@rust-log-analyzer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@Mark-Simulacrum

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bors try

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2026
Make the last non-breaking box impl generalizations
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: a621e2b (a621e2b446eafb53c7a8569f225e0b8cc2429a68)
Base parent: 018018e (018018e881e2db0956f229dbb543e21f058d1ce7)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (a621e2b): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.5% [0.5%, 0.5%] 3
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.5% [-0.6%, -0.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.1% [-0.6%, 0.5%] 5

Cycles

Results (primary 0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.7% [0.4%, 1.2%] 8
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.9% [-1.0%, -0.7%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 0.4% [-1.0%, 1.2%] 10

Binary size

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 479.823s -> 480.026s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 403.70 MiB -> 403.81 MiB (0.03%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Sep 10, 2026
@maxdexh

maxdexh commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@clarfonthey wanna try running crater again?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants