Describe approvals for changing tier 1/2 target host tools status - #1085
Open
jieyouxu wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Describe approvals for changing tier 1/2 target host tools status#1085jieyouxu wants to merge 2 commits into
jieyouxu wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
r? @BoxyUwU rustbot has assigned @BoxyUwU. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
Member
|
Do we want to reduce it to just a second instead of FCP? |
Member
Author
Fine with either so 🤷 |
jieyouxu
marked this pull request as draft
July 30, 2026 14:56
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
(Will update T1 host <=> T1 w/out host as well, as per discussion) |
jieyouxu
changed the title
jieyouxu
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 05:08
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
It wasn't clear previously, and came up in #t-compiler/major changes > Drop tier 2 `i686-pc-windows-gnu` host t… compiler-team#1020 @ 💬 for rust-lang/compiler-team#1020.
For Tier 1
Generally adding or removing T1 host tools are very significant, so RFC + FCP feels justified, just like promotions/demotions between T1 <=> T2.
Discussed during triage meeting.
For Tier 2
The precedents were rust-lang/compiler-team#1020 and rust-lang/compiler-team#961 (tier 2 w/out host tools => tier 2 w/ host tools). I think it's also fine if this was a simple Second, because IMO an FCP feels a bit excessive, but yeah.
cc @davidtwco @BoxyUwU
Rendered