Bound rejected source index retention - #139
Merged
Merged
Conversation
iperev
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 20, 2026 22:00
iperev
marked this pull request as draft
September 20, 2026 22:01
iperev
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 20, 2026 22:05
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
A 6,150-byte rejected input retained 4,203,435 bytes of repeated raw-pointer prefixes. Its descendants cannot be consumed by successful structural validation. Discarding only their retained state fixes that mechanism without returning early and hiding higher-precedence lexical errors.
Validation
npm run checkpassed, including 333 browser tests.Boundaries
This is a private codec resource repair, not a public source-v2 cutover or full Batch B/P9-05 closure. Finite tests do not establish arbitrary grammar equivalence or an OS memory ceiling. No active skill or provider policy changed.
Retrospective
Correct final errors did not observe unnecessary retention before rejection. An independent retained-cardinality oracle now distinguishes it. Existing model qualification was reused; no new parser or duplicated schema was introduced.