[cknitt]

Follow-up to #9002: the comment's Changelog section groups the entries under the changelog's own category headings (scripts/changelogFragments.js's categories), in its order, instead of a flat list led by each category's emoji. #8950's entries, rendered locally:

Changelog

🚀 New Feature

• Add @instanceOf("Class") and @typeOf("…") for abstract types …

🐛 Bug fix

• An untagged variant with both Blob and File cases matches files as File …

🏠 Internal

• Untagged variants recognize stdlib classes only through their @instanceOf annotations …

A fragment that doesn't parse goes under #### :grey_question: Not a changelog fragment with its file name. The budget cap from #9002 counts the headings too.

Tests: the grouping, with two fragments of one category under one heading.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01AzPS5F8RDSGZ6dhfK6NdZp

[github-actions]

Changelog

No changelog entry.

Semantic Diff

1 commit · Full page

Group the comment's changelog entries as the changelog does

_{8de4c2e · cknitt + Claude · Oct 24, 2026, 05:47 UTC}

A flat list led by emojis read unlike the changelog the entries end up in. The entries are now grouped under the changelog's category headings, in its order.

[cknitt]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-24T05:50:13.585542Z	8de4c2e	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: 8de4c2e0d5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

rescript

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript@9007

@rescript/belt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/belt@9007

@rescript/darwin-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/darwin-arm64@9007

@rescript/linux-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/linux-arm64@9007

@rescript/linux-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/linux-x64@9007

@rescript/runtime

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/runtime@9007

@rescript/win32-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@rescript/win32-x64@9007

commit: 8de4c2e

[github-actions]

Developer playground preview: https://rescript-lang.github.io/rescript/dev-playground/?version=pr-9007