Skip to content

Document email analysis completion and latency workflows - #466

Merged
maximelb merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
fbA/analysis-completion
Oct 2, 2026
Merged

maximelb merged 6 commits into
masterfrom
fbA/analysis-completion

Conversation

@maximelb

@maximelb maximelb commented Sep 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explain how to start triage after EMAIL_ANALYSIS_COMPLETE, interpret delayed analysis outcomes and timing, and continue handling verdict changes beyond the initial deadline. Completion applies to emitted live messages, including emitting re-drives; initial historical backfill stays silent. Delivery is at least once with a stable completion_id, and the triage example uses organization-wide suppression on that identity with an explicit 30-day expiry.

Validation: detection examples and the completion suppression response were generated through the CLI and validated by the D&R validator. Strict local documentation build and all checks on the current commit pass; the rendered-build log was read. CLI flags were checked against public help.

Risk: these fields require the matching service rollout. Failed or timed-out work never implies safety. External workflows need durable idempotency beyond the example's suppression horizon. Confirm completion, timing and late revisions after rollout.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

lcbill
lcbill previously approved these changes Sep 30, 2026
@maximelb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/lc-review

@maximelb

maximelb commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The requested AI review produced no review body after more than30 minutes. Adversarial self-review is complete: event paths match the contracts, CLI syntax was checked, both generated D&R examples passed validation, and the rendered documentation build and hosted checks pass. Completion closes an initial window and is never described as a safe verdict. This public PR remains open for maintainer review.

@maximelb

maximelb commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/lc-review

lcbill
lcbill previously approved these changes Oct 1, 2026
@maximelb

maximelb commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/lc-review

lcbill
lcbill previously approved these changes Oct 1, 2026
@maximelb

maximelb commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/lc-review

lcbill
lcbill previously approved these changes Oct 1, 2026
@limacharlie-refractionpoint

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LimaCharlie Cloud Security — code scan

No new code findings were introduced by this pull request.

This check reports and never fails: no gating.fail_on is set on the code_scanning policy.

Scanned refractionPOINT/documentation b3ab604…0ed0736 — only findings new in the head commit are listed; anything already on the base branch is the repository's own finding set, on the Cloud Security Code page.

This comment is updated in place on every push to this pull request.

@maximelb

maximelb commented Oct 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/lc-review

lcbill
lcbill previously approved these changes Oct 1, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@maximelb
maximelb merged commit 1b304be into master Oct 2, 2026
7 checks passed
@maximelb
maximelb deleted the fbA/analysis-completion branch October 2, 2026 00:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants