Skip to content

Email Security: state how D&R-driven actions are attributed - #459

Open
maximelb wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/mailsec-dr-attribution
Open

maximelb wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/mailsec-dr-attribution

Conversation

@maximelb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The page claimed actions dispatched from a D&R rule carry source: dr. That is true for dr-mail rules only. For dr-general rules the audit reason names the rule and actor/source are the extension's key. Also documents that a person's extension request needs mailsec.act, that campaign actions are person-only, and that plain-string reason values in a rule are dropped.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@limacharlie-refractionpoint

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LimaCharlie Cloud Security — code scan

No new code findings were introduced by this pull request.

This check reports and never fails: no gating.fail_on is set on the code_scanning policy.

Scanned refractionPOINT/documentation c22c6a4…a30dc76 — only findings new in the head commit are listed; anything already on the base branch is the repository's own finding set, on the Cloud Security Code page.

This comment is updated in place on every push to this pull request.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants