Skip to content

fix(summary): preserve commitments joined to connection checks - #2252

Merged
r3dbars merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/oct17-summary-regression
Oct 18, 2026
Merged

r3dbars merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix/oct17-summary-regression

Conversation

@r3dbars

@r3dbars r3dbars commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Fix

Fixes #2249. Builds on #2235 and keeps real actions/decisions joined to connection checks without promoting pure audio/screen-share chatter.

Only sentences already on the small-talk/courtesy classification path are split at word-bounded and, but, so before courtesy clauses are removed. Extracted output retains the original sentence and existing decision/action priority.

Evidence

  • Independently reviewed the complete repair against the original Quick summary: skip audio checks, classify on substantive clauses #2235 head; no blocking finding.
  • Inert production-extractor probe: original 1/6 PASS (five expected regression failures), repaired 6/6 PASS. Synthetic sentences only.
  • Permanent regressions cover joined actions, joined decisions and pure joined connection checks.
  • Test-shape, changed source-pin and diff checks PASS.
  • Full combined app/package validation is pending. This remains draft until final applicable CI and integrated validation complete; no native capture or release readiness is claimed.

No product capability, assertion baseline or check was removed or loosened.

…tive clauses

Audio confirmations (I can hear you, I can see your screen) count as small talk, so their weak 'i can' cue no longer creates action items. Decision and action classification now uses the clauses left after courtesy phrases are dropped, so a discarded closer's cue can't steal a real action.

Fixes #2151
Broad substrings like "hear you" and "see you" also matched "hear your
feedback" and "see your concern", so one-clause action items were
dropped as small talk. Match audio checks and the see-you sign-off with
word-bounded patterns instead, and add a test that real work mentioning
someone's input stays an action item.
@r3dbars r3dbars added bug Something isn't working needs owner review Owner must review before merge labels Oct 17, 2026
@r3dbars

r3dbars commented Oct 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Final review: the complete repair diff was independently approved, its original defect reproduced, and its regression tests passed. Exact repair-head CI is green. Combined candidate 75488fb passed mapped checks, fresh full deterministic QA/build and safe synthetic paste verification; see #2255 for evidence and the explicit native, thin-packaging and release limitations. Ready for the owner-authorized ancestry-preserving integration; no release or live hardware clearance is implied.

@r3dbars
r3dbars marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2026 00:24
@r3dbars
r3dbars merged commit bcb0005 into main Oct 18, 2026
12 checks passed
@r3dbars
r3dbars deleted the fix/oct17-summary-regression branch October 18, 2026 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working needs owner review Owner must review before merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Preserve commitments joined to audio checks in quick summaries

1 participant