feat(spec): establish Spec 0.2 design baseline - #262
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Establishes the accepted Spec 0.2 target-design baseline for Cladding 0.10.0 as a bounded continuation router plus canonical decision owners. Adds executable design-ledger validation, deterministic simulations, MCP claim-state separation, token accounting, and the three completed design-validation feature records.
The shipped runtime remains schema 0.1. D01-D23 remain explicitly implementation pending and will land through separate F1-F9 feature branches.
Verification
Scope
Reviewer notes
This PR intentionally separates accepted design from shipped behavior. Pending runtime journeys, reference-host E2E, MCP adoption, and live-host token advantage remain labelled implementation_pending, not_run, or inconclusive rather than being promoted to PASS.
A delegated pre-merge review also identified possible follow-up hardening around discriminating MCP/model fixtures, canonical-owner attestation coverage, README test-file counts, and the repository CHANGELOG contract. Those findings are not hidden by this baseline PR and can be resolved during review before merge if required.