Repository navigation
Qualcomm AI Engine Direct - Support Gemma RMSNorm recomposition - #24166
quic-xiyushi wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/24166
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 2 Pending, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 453116b with merge base 14b5e1d ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
Hi @quic-xiyushi! Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
Co-authored-by: Tanya-Motwani <motwani@qti.qualcomm.com>
f6d84ba to
0a06661
Compare
|
/easycla |
|
@pytorchbot label "release notes: qualcomm" |
|
@claude review this pr thoroughlly |
|
Claude finished @psiddh's task in 4m 27s —— View job Summary: This PR adds Gemma-style Detailed reviewPR Review: #24166SummaryThe PR extends Code Quality
Testing
RecommendationRequest Changes. The guards should check the wildcard-skipped nodes and gamma's shape and origin; until they do, wrong fusions can still happen. Picking gamma should not depend on operand order. The |
|
@quic-xiyushi can you look at claude review ? I looked at it and it seems reasonable suggestion to me |
@psiddh , I’ve addressed Claude’s review suggestions. Thank you! |
Summary
Test plan