Create README.md - #131
Open
monica-cheng1 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
monica-cheng1
enabled auto-merge
August 21, 2026 13:18
| ## Inputs & outputs | ||
|
|
||
| * **Input:** raw or processed data files — FASTQ (single, paired, multi-lane, multiplexed, tagged), FASTA, bulk count matrices, Cell Ranger MTX, H5, H5AD, multisample H5AD, Seurat RDS, multisample Seurat RDS, per-sample CSV/TSV — plus a metadata table or directly entered metadata. | ||
| * **Output:** one or more named datasets mapped to samples, with sample metadata attached, consumable by every upstream analysis block. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Calling the consumers of these datasets “upstream” contradicts the README’s description of Samples & Data as the starting block whose outputs feed downstream analyses, making the documented workflow direction confusing.
Suggested change
| * **Output:** one or more named datasets mapped to samples, with sample metadata attached, consumable by every upstream analysis block. | |
| * **Output:** one or more named datasets mapped to samples, with sample metadata attached, consumable by every downstream analysis block. |
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: README.md
Line: 22
Comment:
**Reversed workflow direction**
Calling the consumers of these datasets “upstream” contradicts the README’s description of Samples & Data as the starting block whose outputs feed downstream analyses, making the documented workflow direction confusing.
```suggestion
* **Output:** one or more named datasets mapped to samples, with sample metadata attached, consumable by every downstream analysis block.
```
---
For each issue above, determine whether it is valid and should be fixed. If so, fix it directly.Note: If this suggestion doesn't match your team's coding style, reply to this and let me know. I'll remember it for next time!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Greptile Summary
The PR adds a top-level README explaining the Samples & Data block, its supported inputs, outputs, workflow role, use cases, and common setup questions.
Confidence Score: 4/5
The PR appears safe to merge after correcting the non-blocking workflow-direction terminology in the output description.
The documentation is otherwise internally consistent and introduces no runtime behavior, but one user-facing sentence reverses the established direction of data flow.
Files Needing Attention: README.md
Important Files Changed
Prompt To Fix All With AI
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Create README.md" | Re-trigger Greptile