fix(PlusIcon): Replace PlusIcon with RhUiAddIcon#12520
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 52 seconds Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
Walkthrough
ChangesPlusIcon → RhUiAddIcon replacement
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Preview: https://pf-react-pr-12520.surge.sh A11y report: https://pf-react-pr-12520-a11y.surge.sh |
1a08782 to
ec81521
Compare
ec81521 to
ab5acfd
Compare
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
ab5acfd to
e1c1446
Compare
What:
Part of #12402. Breaking into separate PRs so it is easier to review.
Additional issues:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Style
Documentation
Tests