Skip to content

[release-5.0] OCPBUGS-113994: Raise status polling timeout and write bound - #31559

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-5.0from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-31534-to-release-5.0
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

[release-5.0] OCPBUGS-113994: Raise status polling timeout and write bound#31559
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift:release-5.0from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-31534-to-release-5.0

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31534

/assign jcmoraisjr

/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 release-4.19

The 3-replica conflicting router stress test was intermittently failing
in two independent places.

1. Polling timeout 2m -> 5m: the leader election lease lasts 1 minute.
   Under normal conditions all route statuses are written within 1-2
   lease cycles, which fit in the previous 2-minute timeout. Under
   heavier contention a router replica may need to re-acquire the lease
   3 or more times until all routes are updated.

2. Write upper bound 50 -> 75: the per-route contention detector runs
   asynchronously and can lag behind update events, allowing a few extra
   writes before suppressing further updates. The previous limit of 50
   caused intermittent failures; 75 is a more conservative ceiling.

https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/OCPBUGS-99536
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review label Aug 25, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 330523eb-7cd3-4c53-bfd7-11586d27649b

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from Miciah and Thealisyed August 25, 2026 21:05
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99536 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-113994. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-5.0] OCPBUGS-113994: Raise status polling timeout and write bound

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31534

/assign jcmoraisjr

/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-5.0] OCPBUGS-99536: Raise status polling timeout and write bound [release-5.0] OCPBUGS-113994: Raise status polling timeout and write bound Aug 25, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 25, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-113994, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31534

/assign jcmoraisjr

/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed in the openshift-microshift-infra-rpm-install-aws pre-step before the router e2e test phase. The failure is a repeated DNF dependency conflict between MicroShift's cri-o >= 1.36.0, < 1.37.0 requirement and available CRI-O packages; PR #31559 changes only router status polling and write-bound assertions in test/extended/router/stress.go.

Evidence:

  • 7 non-e2e checks passed, including unit, lint, verify, images, and dependency verification.
  • The failing pre-step retried the same CRI-O resolution conflict three times and exited before router tests ran.
  • CI analysis found the identical CRI-O conflict in other MicroShift presubmits and periodic jobs, indicating a shared RPM/repository issue rather than a router-test regression.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed in the openshift-microshift-infra-rpm-install-aws pre-step before the router e2e test phase. The failure is a repeated DNF dependency conflict between MicroShift's cri-o >= 1.36.0, < 1.37.0 requirement and available CRI-O packages; PR #31559 changes only router status polling and write-bound assertions in test/extended/router/stress.go.

Evidence:

  • 7 non-e2e checks passed, including unit, lint, verify, images, and dependency verification.
  • The failing pre-step retried the same CRI-O resolution conflict three times and exited before router tests ran.
  • CI analysis found the identical CRI-O conflict in other MicroShift presubmits and periodic jobs, indicating a shared RPM/repository issue rather than a router-test regression.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The e2e test phase completed successfully; the job failed afterward while releasing lease vsphere-elastic-40 after repeated 502 Bad Gateway/503 Service Unavailable responses from the lease proxy. The PR changes only the router stress test polling timeout and write bound, and the failure did not occur in that test.

Evidence:

  • The Prow log reports Step e2e-vsphere-ovn-openshift-e2e-test succeeded and then status 503 Service Unavailable, statusCode 503 releasing vsphere-elastic-40.
  • The same PR had matching lease-proxy 503 failures in the GCP OVN and AWS OVN serial jobs, while unit, lint, verify, images, CSI, and GCP OVN upgrade checks passed.
  • The PR modifies only test/extended/router/stress.go; no router-test failure is reported in this job.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The e2e test phase completed successfully; the job failed afterward while releasing lease vsphere-elastic-40 after repeated 502 Bad Gateway/503 Service Unavailable responses from the lease proxy. The PR changes only the router stress test polling timeout and write bound, and the failure did not occur in that test.

Evidence:

  • The Prow log reports Step e2e-vsphere-ovn-openshift-e2e-test succeeded and then status 503 Service Unavailable, statusCode 503 releasing vsphere-elastic-40.
  • The same PR had matching lease-proxy 503 failures in the GCP OVN and AWS OVN serial jobs, while unit, lint, verify, images, CSI, and GCP OVN upgrade checks passed.
  • The PR modifies only test/extended/router/stress.go; no router-test failure is reported in this job.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jcmoraisjr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Unrelated failures, giving them another chance.

/retest-required

@jcmoraisjr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 26, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jcmoraisjr: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-113994, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99536 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-99536 targets the "5.1.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.1.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested a review from melvinjoseph86 August 26, 2026 12:18
@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed during release:latest image assembly before the e2e test phase. The release pod remained in PodInitializing for over one hour, with repeated pod-sandbox DeadlineExceeded/RST_STREAM errors and image-pull delays; the changed router test was never executed.

Evidence:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, unit, lint, and verify passed.
  • The PR changes only test/extended/router/stress.go; no infrastructure or release-assembly configuration was changed.
  • The failing log ends with executing_graph:step_failed:assembling_release:creating_release:running_pod:pod_pending and Container release is not ready with reason PodInitializing.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed during release:latest image assembly before the e2e test phase. The release pod remained in PodInitializing for over one hour, with repeated pod-sandbox DeadlineExceeded/RST_STREAM errors and image-pull delays; the changed router test was never executed.

Evidence:

  • ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi, ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, unit, lint, and verify passed.
  • The PR changes only test/extended/router/stress.go; no infrastructure or release-assembly configuration was changed.
  • The failing log ends with executing_graph:step_failed:assembling_release:creating_release:running_pod:pod_pending and Container release is not ready with reason PodInitializing.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jcmoraisjr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Failed to provision the testing cluster, they are not permafailing, trying again.

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

@gcs278

gcs278 commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wow chai bot is pretty aggressive with the overrides. That's something we should be careful of. Chai bot gave e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial one chance and overrode it.

This is a pretty harmless PR, so I think it's okay, but let's be very cautious.

Either way, this is a straightforward backport for e2e fix. I'll provide an LGTM.
/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 26, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gcs278, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 26, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 00481d0 and 2 for PR HEAD cc0ae34 in total

@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed while building the CI tests-amd64 image, before cluster provisioning or any e2e test ran. The build could not reach the internal rhel-9-openstack-17-rpms repository and then reported No package matches 'python3-cinderclient'; the PR only changes test/extended/router/stress.go.

Evidence:

  • The terminal reason is DockerBuildFailed / executing_graph:step_failed:building_project_image, not a test failure.
  • The build log reports Curl error (7): Couldn't connect to server ... base-openstack-4-22.ocp.svc ... port 80: Connection refused followed by error: No package matches 'python3-cinderclient'.
  • 17 of 20 PR checks passed, including e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2, e2e-gcp-ovn, e2e-aws-csi, and unit/verify/lint checks.
  • The changed file is test/extended/router/stress.go; no router test executed in this run.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Rationale: The job failed while building the CI tests-amd64 image, before cluster provisioning or any e2e test ran. The build could not reach the internal rhel-9-openstack-17-rpms repository and then reported No package matches 'python3-cinderclient'; the PR only changes test/extended/router/stress.go.

Evidence:

  • The terminal reason is DockerBuildFailed / executing_graph:step_failed:building_project_image, not a test failure.
  • The build log reports Curl error (7): Couldn't connect to server ... base-openstack-4-22.ocp.svc ... port 80: Connection refused followed by error: No package matches 'python3-cinderclient'.
  • 17 of 20 PR checks passed, including e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2, e2e-gcp-ovn, e2e-aws-csi, and unit/verify/lint checks.
  • The changed file is test/extended/router/stress.go; no router test executed in this run.

If you disagree with this assessment, /retest ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 to re-run the job.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jcmoraisjr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips

@knobunc knobunc added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Aug 27, 2026
@sdodson sdodson added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 31, 2026
@sdodson

sdodson commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/verified by CI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Aug 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sdodson: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@redhat-chai-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override-sticky ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Job classification: Eligible long-running presubmit end-to-end job. The definition uses the baremetalds-e2e-ovn-ipv6 workflow with the equinix-ocp-metal cluster profile and baremetalds-e2e-test; the run lasted 3h50m.
Revision check: run cc0ae34c8ee11cbd43c56067c7fe917f0032a512; current PR HEAD cc0ae34c8ee11cbd43c56067c7fe917f0032a512; match.
Execution status: Tests executed. The test container ran for 3h49m43s. The suite completed with 2,152 passed, 1 blocking failure, 8 informing failures, 0 flaky, and 2,248 skipped tests. The blocking failure was CRDValidationRatcheting; its failure occurred in cleanup while deleting a CRD, with context deadline exceeded.
Completed supporting jobs: e2e-aws-csi, e2e-aws-ovn-fips, e2e-aws-ovn-microshift, e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial, e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2, e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2, e2e-gcp-csi, e2e-gcp-ovn, e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, e2e-vsphere-ovn, and e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi passed. tide is still pending.
Overlap assessment: The PR modifies only test/extended/router/stress.go, changing router stress-test polling and write bounds. The failed test is [sig-api-machinery] CRDValidationRatcheting, which exercises CRD validation behavior and failed during CRD teardown. No direct or indirect overlap with the PR changes was found.
Missing-coverage risk: Low for this failure. The relevant validation assertions ran; the failure was teardown cleanup rather than the validation logic. Other completed e2e jobs on the same revision passed, including the AWS, GCP, and vSphere coverage listed above. This override does not waive the need to rerun the current job if the failure recurs.
Rationale: The same CRD cleanup-timeout signature (failed to delete CustomResourceDefinition ... context deadline exceeded) occurred in another recent origin presubmit on PR #31573, while that PR's e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 run passed. Recent CI analysis found this is a rare recurring presubmit flake (1 failure in 935 recent presubmit executions), not evidence of a regression in this router test change.

If you disagree with this assessment, rerun the current job with /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@redhat-chai-bot: Overrode contexts on behalf of redhat-chai-bot: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

These overrides will persist across retests on the current HEAD SHA. Pushing a new commit will clear them. Use /override-cancel to remove them.

Details

In response to this:

/override-sticky ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Automated triage: This failure appears unrelated to the PR changes.

Job classification: Eligible long-running presubmit end-to-end job. The definition uses the baremetalds-e2e-ovn-ipv6 workflow with the equinix-ocp-metal cluster profile and baremetalds-e2e-test; the run lasted 3h50m.
Revision check: run cc0ae34c8ee11cbd43c56067c7fe917f0032a512; current PR HEAD cc0ae34c8ee11cbd43c56067c7fe917f0032a512; match.
Execution status: Tests executed. The test container ran for 3h49m43s. The suite completed with 2,152 passed, 1 blocking failure, 8 informing failures, 0 flaky, and 2,248 skipped tests. The blocking failure was CRDValidationRatcheting; its failure occurred in cleanup while deleting a CRD, with context deadline exceeded.
Completed supporting jobs: e2e-aws-csi, e2e-aws-ovn-fips, e2e-aws-ovn-microshift, e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial, e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2, e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2, e2e-gcp-csi, e2e-gcp-ovn, e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade, e2e-vsphere-ovn, and e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi passed. tide is still pending.
Overlap assessment: The PR modifies only test/extended/router/stress.go, changing router stress-test polling and write bounds. The failed test is [sig-api-machinery] CRDValidationRatcheting, which exercises CRD validation behavior and failed during CRD teardown. No direct or indirect overlap with the PR changes was found.
Missing-coverage risk: Low for this failure. The relevant validation assertions ran; the failure was teardown cleanup rather than the validation logic. Other completed e2e jobs on the same revision passed, including the AWS, GCP, and vSphere coverage listed above. This override does not waive the need to rerun the current job if the failure recurs.
Rationale: The same CRD cleanup-timeout signature (failed to delete CustomResourceDefinition ... context deadline exceeded) occurred in another recent origin presubmit on PR #31573, while that PR's e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 run passed. Recent CI analysis found this is a rare recurring presubmit flake (1 failure in 935 recent presubmit executions), not evidence of a regression in this router test change.

If you disagree with this assessment, rerun the current job with /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6.


AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift cc0ae34 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial cc0ae34 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 cc0ae34 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 cc0ae34 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 2602295 into openshift:release-5.0 Sep 1, 2026
20 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-113994
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-113994 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31534

/assign jcmoraisjr

/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: new pull request created: #31582

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #31534

/assign jcmoraisjr

/cherrypick release-4.22 release-4.21 release-4.20 release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix included in release 5.0.0-0.nightly-2026-09-02-184128

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ready-for-human-review Indicates a PR has been reviewed by automated tools and is ready for human review staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.