OBSDOCS-3628: Fix Vale and DITA compliance issues (6.6 cherry-pick) - #116572
Conversation
|
@johnwilkins: This pull request references OBSDOCS-3628 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
🤖 Mon Jul 27 15:39:10 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://116572--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/ |
2f7ddc0 to
f10ac35
Compare
OBSDOCS-3628: Fix Vale and DITA compliance issues
f10ac35 to
ad25668
Compare
056a027
into
openshift:standalone-logging-docs-6.6
|
@johnwilkins: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
OBSDOCS-3628: Fix Vale and DITA compliance issues (6.6 cherry-pick)
Manual cherry-pick of #116457 to standalone-logging-docs-6.6.
Conflicts Resolved
While not entirely clear to me, when GitHub was acting flaky recently, the modules/about-azure-logs-ingestion-api.adoc and modules/logging-forwarding-azure-logs-ingestion.adoc modules (along with 8 other Azure modules) were deleted in OBSDOCS-3539 PR. It seems like git did the rebase incorrectly or there was a workflow error.
See original PR #116457 for full details.
Testing
Signed-off-by: John Wilkins jowilkin@redhat.com