Skip to content

docs: describe the Reddit Atom feed route and its limits - #55

Merged
only-cli merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reddit-feeds
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

docs: describe the Reddit Atom feed route and its limits#55
only-cli merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/reddit-feeds

Conversation

@only-cli

@only-cli only-cli commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Follow-up to #53 and the 0.5.2 release. The code already reads Reddit through its Atom feeds; this brings the rest of the documentation in line.

  • README access paragraph: Reddit joins the list of sites read through a feed or API, with a note that a reddit.com page URL handed to `oc open` still meets the login wall, that `oc reddit post ` or a `/.rss` suffix reads the thread, that the feeds carry no scores or comment counts, and that anonymous reddit.com allows about ten requests a minute.
  • README Benchmarks: the 0.5.1 numbers stand, with a note that the suite hands every tool the old.reddit.com page URLs, so it does not measure the feed route yet.
  • llms.txt: Reddit is marked as read via its Atom feeds, matching the Stack Overflow note.
  • skills/web-browsing-cli/SKILL.md: one sentence telling agents to use the shortcut or a `/.rss` URL and to keep Reddit calls under about ten a minute.

No code changes. `npm test`: 215 passing.

The README access paragraph, llms.txt, and the skill now say that oc reddit
reads the www.reddit.com Atom feeds, that a reddit.com page URL given to
oc open still meets the login wall, and that anonymous reddit.com allows
about ten requests a minute. The Benchmarks section notes that the suite
still measures the old.reddit.com page URLs, not the feed route.
@only-cli
only-cli merged commit 431dad3 into main Sep 4, 2026
4 checks passed
@only-cli
only-cli deleted the docs/reddit-feeds branch September 4, 2026 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant