Skip to content

Add reusable SBOM vulnerability workflow - #85

Merged
mmacata merged 22 commits into
mundialis:mainfrom
TaniaGithub0401:add-reusable-sbom-vulnerability-workflow
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

mmacata merged 22 commits into
mundialis:mainfrom
TaniaGithub0401:add-reusable-sbom-vulnerability-workflow

Conversation

@TaniaGithub0401

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds a reusable workflow to get the list of dependencies and vulnerabilities using Syft and Grype.
The README includes instructions for reuse and configurable inputs.

Comment thread README.md Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/sbom-vulnerability-scan.yml Outdated
Comment thread .github/workflows/sbom-vulnerability-scan.yml Outdated

@mmacata mmacata left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very cool, thank you!

@mmacata
mmacata merged commit 1190e85 into mundialis:main Sep 9, 2026
3 checks passed
anikaweinmann pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2026
* Add reusable SBOM vulnerability workflow

* Add SBOM workflow documentation

* Upload vulnerability results to code scanning

* Retest reusable SBOM workflow

* update readme  SBOM vulnerability scan

* Support Dockerfile and requirements inputs

* inspect sarif locations

* Fix SARIF locations for requirements scan

* test python vulnerability scan

* upload python vulnerability results to code scanning

* add categories to vulnerabilities

* add requirements-based SBOM and vulnerability scanning

* Update SBOM workflow documentation

* update SBOM documentation

* Compare Grype scan sources

* Summarize Docker scan comparison results

* specific vulnerabilities

* Propose SBOM vulnerability scan strategy

* Support pyproject.toml for Python scans

* Document pyproject.toml support

* Make checkout fetch depth configurable

* Refine SBOM scan configuration and documentation
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants