Skip to content

Challenge 25: Verify the safety of VecDeque functions #286

Description

@thanhnguyen-aws

Activity

  1. vrindisbacher commented on May 8, 2025

    @vrindisbacher

    Hey there - following the book link gives me a 404. Is this still a challenge?

  2. tautschnig commented on May 9, 2025

    @tautschnig
    Member

    It will become one, we just haven’t yet received approval from the rewards committee on #269.

  3. added 3 commits that reference this issue on Mar 24, 2026
    40ae507
    10224fd
    2a16efd
  4. jrey8343 commented on Sep 13, 2026

    @jrey8343

    Solution PR: #681 (Kani; unbounded, symbolic ring layouts, contracts on all 13 unsafe functions, harnesses on all 30 safe abstractions; labelled Accepted Solution pending committee items). The open item is the "generic type T (no monomorphization)" clause, which Kani cannot meet literally; the ruling request with a proposed ruling text is here: #681 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    ChallengeUsed to tag a challenge

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions