Skip to content

[API tests] Ensure vendor-payment journal number series - #11228

Closed
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) wants to merge 5 commits into
prdas/646383-split-quote-datesfrom
prdas/646383-split-journal-numbering
Closed

Prangshuman Das (t-prda) wants to merge 5 commits into
prdas/646383-split-quote-datesfrom
prdas/646383-split-journal-numbering

Conversation

@t-prda

@t-prda Prangshuman Das (t-prda) commented Sep 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes AB#653125

Scope

Assign a generated number series only when the test-created vendor-payment journal batch lacks one. Keep production numbering behavior unchanged.

Related umbrella646383.

Evidence and limits

Two observed CZ failures in saved result set 2: CU139843.TestCreateVendorPaymentWithoutDocNo and CU139867.TestApplyVendorEntryAppliesPayment. There are 18 direct test callers of the shared helper, but only these two failures are evidenced by those saved results.

Only this layer's original fix/exclusion patch is reviewed here (2 paths); the patch is unchanged by Expense-first restructuring.

Exact head: 202c33bd4f85fa13eab6c1b73a35518347940293; tree: 74300ae9d5678a4d432452e90cfc7e6a597195f6.

Expense-first sequencing using existing exclusions

The same 193 method-specific temporary exclusions (135 APIV1 +58 APIV2 across12 codeunits) now live in the existing src/DisabledTests/_Exclude_APIV1__Tests/_Exclude_APIV1__Tests.DisabledTest.json and src/DisabledTests/_Exclude_APIV2__Tests/_Exclude_APIV2__Tests.DisabledTest.json. No separate sequencing files remain. Original entries retain their order/style/content; no new duplicate or wildcard/codeunit-wide exclusion is introduced. Unrelated pre-existing APIV2 duplicates are preserved rather than mixed with this change.

#11860 removes the temporary additions from these same existing manifests alongside its already-reviewed authentication uptake. All193 temporary stage entries are removed in #11860, but it makes 192/193 target methods eligible: the independent 139739::TestDeleteInUse exclusion remains until the VAT fixture fix PR #11224 removes it. From #11224 onward all193 are eligible; eligibility is not runtime success. All general/downstream cumulative trees are exactly byte-identical to the preceding checkpoint; the full checkpoint has none of these193 methods excluded. No app-name allowlist, selection setting, runner/authentication/test/production change or Logiq exclusion is added.

Why these methods started executing: they already required Disabled isolation and were IntegrationTest codeunits. Ordinary typed selection in TestSuiteMgt332–352 selects None|Codeunit; the old extra Disabled pass in RunTestsInBcContainer was UnitTest-only. The clean-execution switch newly reaches Disabled IntegrationTest codeunits and still honors the existing JSON exclusions. These193 methods were not listed in those exclusions. This is a pre-existing selection gap, not a newly introduced product auth bug or proof they never ran in any historical configuration. A complete67-codeunit audit preserves existing UnitTest/Legacy behavior and the ten independently handled Logiq integration tests.

**Expense scope is unchanged:**51 API reenables, nine non-API exclusions, baseline six cases and all consolidated regressions. The two legacy Spend Requests methods remain conditional on not CLEAN30. Focused #12325 review:21 files, including the two existing exclusion manifests. General #11860 review:159 files.

The official NAV Disable-NAVALTest helper was inspected: it has no destination/app-file parameter, writes NAV's App/DisabledTests using per-codeunit filenames and sorts entries. It cannot safely preserve these BCApps files. A bounded JSON relocation preserved original prefixes/order and checked exact identities, then exercised the unchanged real loader. No new shared helper/framework or NAV selector change was made.

Validation and presentation evidence

Pester117/117 passed independently at the new Expense/general/full heads. Actual existing-loader checks confirm identical effective193-method selection after relocation and preserved51/9 Expense scope. All nine downstream Git tree hashes remain exactly unchanged. Fresh exact-head CI is pending; old-head successes are not substituted for current runtime evidence.

Historical run37330893173 at head88881be reached193 general methods:171 genuine401 failures and22 nominal passes (17 bare-ASSERTERROR cases can accept the wrong error; five local fixtures). Separately, all51 Expense methods passed in13 inspected countries (663 results), and all63 touched API methods yielded819 results; Activity coverage was117/198 at that checkpoint. These are bounded historical results, not a full/current matrix pass. The preceding stage-fix runs hit50 hosted-runner acquisition cancellations; other jobs were active, so this was not a claimed global outage. New pushes schedule fresh CI, not an AL retry. The general SQL-pool NRE and missing warning-reference artifacts remain separate unresolved limitations.

Durable session presentation notes: api-test-enablement-presentation-notes.md, with source-pinned selection proof, fix/coverage inventory, helper limitations and historical-vs-current evidence boundaries. Fresh runtime proof must still establish the51 Expense cases and actual193-case suppression at Expense stage.

Related umbrella646383. Native stack #12327 remains #12325 → #11860 → #11224 → #11225 → #11226 → #11227 → #11228 → #11229 → #11230 → #11322. Protected merged #10085/#11862/#11891 and validation #11892 are untouched; validation-only #11861/#11455 remain Do Not Merge. No new main integration, native-group/base change, PR merge, queue operation, Actions cancellation or manual retry was made. All prior heads remain ancestors; source publication used backups and an atomic forward-only push with explicit leases.

Exact current head: 202c33bd4f85fa13eab6c1b73a35518347940293; source tree: 74300ae9d5678a4d432452e90cfc7e6a597195f6.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Stale Status Check Deleted

The Pull Request Build workflow run for this PR was older than 72 hours and has been deleted.

📋 Why was it deleted?

Status checks that are too old may no longer reflect the current state of the target branch. To ensure this PR is validated against the latest code and passes up-to-date checks, a fresh build is required.


🔄 How to trigger a new status check:

  1. 📤 Push a new commit to the PR branch, or
  2. 🔁 Close and reopen the PR

This will automatically trigger a new Pull Request Build workflow run.

@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) removed this pull request from stack #11232 September 24, 2026 15:27
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) added this pull request to stack #11863 September 24, 2026 15:27
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) removed this pull request from stack #11863 September 25, 2026 08:46
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) added this pull request to stack #11893 September 25, 2026 08:47
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #11561 is not valid. Please make sure you link an issue that exists, is open and is approved.

@t-prda Prangshuman Das (t-prda) added the Team: Finance GitHub request for Finance area label Sep 28, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the Team: Finance GitHub request for Finance area label Sep 28, 2026
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2026 11:09
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) requested a review from a team September 28, 2026 11:09
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) requested a review from a team as a code owner September 28, 2026 11:09
@alexei-dobriansky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Good Sense Reviewer - Round 1

Recommendation: Accept

What this PR does

This change gives a test-created vendor-payment journal batch a generated number series when its template leaves that value blank. The guard addresses the failure at its source, preserves an existing configured series, and lets API tests generate document numbers as expected.

Problem-solution fit

Fit: Strong

The change directly covers the reported vendor-payment failures, and both re-enabled scenarios exercise the updated shared helper.

Suggestions

None.

Risk assessment and necessity

Risk: Low. The change is limited to test infrastructure. It affects the vendor-payment tests that use this helper, but only fills a blank number series and leaves existing configuration unchanged.

Necessity: The change is needed to run the two previously disabled scenarios in environments where the vendor-payment template has no number series.


[AI-PR-REVIEW] version=1 promptVersion=4 system=github pr=11228 round=1 by=alexei-dobriansky at=2026-09-28T22:21:45.9059082Z lastSha=7641cd6f04750a7fa3d92777fa6777f413c81835 reviewKey=aac7d5fb76e8f29646069dd84697ecadb6ba793ae345299e11bd7d89fe68e7aa suggestions=none

@alexei-dobriansky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Good Sense Reviewer - Round 2

Recommendation: Accept

What this PR does

The commits since round 1 reconcile the stacked parent only. The layer-owned AL code is unchanged, and the net diff still assigns a generated number series only when the test-created vendor-payment batch lacks one, then re-enables the same two scenarios.

Status of previous suggestions

Round 1 had no suggestions.

New observations (commits since round 1)

None — no new layer-owned hunk appears in both the incremental view and the current net PR diff.

Risk assessment and necessity

Risk: Low. The change remains test-only, preserves configured number series, and changes shared-helper behavior only when the generated batch has no series. Fresh exact-head runtime validation is pending.

Necessity: The change remains necessary to run the two vendor-payment scenarios where the template provides no number series.


[AI-PR-REVIEW] version=1 promptVersion=4 system=github pr=11228 round=2 by=alexei-dobriansky at=2026-10-02T22:25:54.7350824Z lastSha=582fe9675fc8365823fb9d894d422ad874f4e08d reviewKey=df3efa1a79919e1ddf4431858d49008cb6d984e993c72fa6626005b41f19efab suggestions=none parentRound=1

begin
JournalName := LibraryUtility.GenerateRandomCode(GenJournalBatch.FieldNo(Name), DATABASE::"Gen. Journal Batch");
LibraryAPIGeneralJournal.EnsureGenJnlBatchExists(GraphMgtJournal.GetDefaultVendorPaymentsTemplateName(), JournalName);
GenJournalBatch.Get(GraphMgtJournal.GetDefaultVendorPaymentsTemplateName(), JournalName);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

$\textbf{🟡\ Medium\ Severity\ —\ Performance}$

CreateVendorPaymentsJournal calls EnsureGenJnlBatchExists, which already performs a primary-key Get for this template and batch, and then immediately performs the same Get again before checking No. Series. This adds an avoidable database round trip on every helper call; return or pass through the record loaded by the ensure helper, or otherwise combine the existence check and No. Series update into one lookup.

👍 useful · ❤️ especially valuable · 👎 wrong - reply with why · AL review agent v1.48.6

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session:3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session:3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session:3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session:3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session:3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #11224 is not valid. Please make sure you link an issue that exists, is open and is approved.

@alexei-dobriansky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Good Sense Reviewer - Round 3

Recommendation: Accept

What this PR does

The commits since round 2 reconcile the stacked parent only. Both scoped file blobs are unchanged, and the net diff still assigns a generated number series only when the test-created vendor-payment batch lacks one, then re-enables the same two scenarios.

Status of previous suggestions

Rounds 1 and 2 had no suggestions.

New observations (commits since round 2)

None — the two scoped files are byte-identical to round 2, and no new layer-owned hunk appears in the current net PR diff.

Risk assessment and necessity

Risk: Low. The change remains test-only, preserves an existing configured number series, and changes shared-helper behavior only when the generated batch has no series. Fresh exact-head runtime validation is still pending.

Necessity: The change remains necessary to run the two vendor-payment scenarios where the template provides no number series.


[AI-PR-REVIEW] version=1 promptVersion=4 system=github pr=11228 round=3 by=alexei-dobriansky at=2026-10-05T22:55:30.134Z lastSha=202c33bd4f85fa13eab6c1b73a35518347940293 reviewKey=ed47874996b9dab420b1c53bced349df1fc9591608d969802bc6e78f4f5af2d3 suggestions=none parentRound=2

melnikbo pushed a commit to melnikbo/BCApps that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2026
…microsoft#12325)

## Scope

Related authentication and API enablement:
[AB#646383](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/Dynamics%20SMB/_workitems/edit/646383)
(link only; this PR does not resolve the umbrella item).

Fixes
[AB#653119](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/1fcb79e7-ab07-432a-a3c6-6cf5a88ba4a5/_workitems/edit/653119)

Separate test defect: [653119 - Policy snapshot API URL composition and
response
isolation](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/Dynamics%20SMB/_workitems/edit/653119).
This tracks the policy-snapshot test corrections, not production access
permissions or unrelated runtime failures.

Expense-first adoption directly against main after the external squash
merge of workflow microsoft#11891; remaining general APIs follow in microsoft#11860.

- Migrate the 11 reviewed Expense API/helper paths to shared
authentication and remove exactly 51 existing Expense API exclusions.
Preserve exactly nine non-API Expense exclusions; all 19 previously
retained API exclusions are now removed.
- Enable the existing `enableCleanTestCodeunitExecution` boolean. Use
existing DisabledTests selectors throughout discovery, ordinary
execution and clean-codeunit execution/reruns. No app-name allowlist,
new selection setting or runner implementation/test change.
- Include the six-line license-safe WorkDate helper needed by PerDiem,
five query-safe policy URL compositions, four independent response
clears, and the existing unlimited-approval fixture. Preserve all nine
Activity Log tests and upstream assertions.
- Consolidate microsoft#11453's exact assigned-user filter (no cross-table range
compression), true fallback fixture and regressions. Upstream wildcard
quoting alone did not fix the range-gap case.
- Consolidate microsoft#11451's unique denied-approval error/permission capture
and microsoft#11454's existing repeated-delta, missing-header-permission,
Released-status and real deletion-total regressions, including its
internal test-only permission set.
- Do not reintroduce upstream repairs from microsoft#11654 (three permission-role
tests and posted zero-amount fixture), the obsolete date test removed by
microsoft#12074, or the production indirect-Modify change already supplied by
microsoft#11333. microsoft#11452's duplicate deletion helper is absent; existing callers
use the upstream shared helper.
- All seven artificial Expense exclusions introduced by the previous
uptake are absent here and at every general checkpoint. This is not
blanket re-enablement of Expense tests.

This focused review diff has21 paths, using the two existing API
exclusion manifests. No NAV selectors, local NST, BC-ExpenseAgent
changes, unrelated new test scope or production permission changes.

Exact head: `bd3bbc04e13965f967a26eef435bdbf0cbc09ad7`; tree:
`2b8c47b138846f63bd49d47188f54ea7e86c1f24`.

## Expense-first sequencing using existing exclusions

The same **193 method-specific temporary exclusions (135 APIV1 +58 APIV2
across12 codeunits)** now live in the existing
`src/DisabledTests/_Exclude_APIV1__Tests/_Exclude_APIV1__Tests.DisabledTest.json`
and
`src/DisabledTests/_Exclude_APIV2__Tests/_Exclude_APIV2__Tests.DisabledTest.json`.
No separate sequencing files remain. Original entries retain their
order/style/content; no new duplicate or wildcard/codeunit-wide
exclusion is introduced. Unrelated pre-existing APIV2 duplicates are
preserved rather than mixed with this change.

microsoft#11860 removes the temporary additions from these same existing
manifests alongside its already-reviewed authentication uptake. All193
temporary stage entries are removed in microsoft#11860, but it makes **192/193
target methods eligible**: the independent `139739::TestDeleteInUse`
exclusion remains until the VAT fixture correction in PR
[microsoft#11224](microsoft#11224) removes it.
From microsoft#11224 onward all193 are eligible; eligibility is not runtime
success. All general/downstream cumulative trees are **exactly
byte-identical** to the preceding checkpoint; the full checkpoint has
none of these193 methods excluded. No app-name allowlist, selection
setting, runner/authentication/test/production change or Logiq exclusion
is added.

**Why these methods started executing:** they already required Disabled
isolation and were IntegrationTest codeunits. Ordinary typed selection
in TestSuiteMgt332–352 selects None|Codeunit; the old extra Disabled
pass in RunTestsInBcContainer was UnitTest-only. The clean-execution
switch newly reaches Disabled IntegrationTest codeunits and still honors
the existing JSON exclusions. These193 methods were not listed in those
exclusions. This is a pre-existing selection gap, not a newly introduced
product auth bug or proof they never ran in any historical
configuration. A complete67-codeunit audit preserves existing
UnitTest/Legacy behavior and the ten independently handled Logiq
integration tests. Historical baseline run37215976231 at
head69df41756d918a516a3c868ca66f45cbfd320428 independently corroborates
this: zero of the exact193 methods appear across five inspected W1
result artifacts containing37,626 testcases (Integration, both Legacy
buckets, default/unit and Uncategorized). This evidence is limited to
that W1 baseline, not every country or historical run. The completed
alternate-path audit found no other ordinary configured baseline BCApps
lane: APIV1/APIV2 are outside Legacy buckets, Disabled-unit fallback
retains UnitTest filtering, discovery skips test procedures, and
ordinary PR/CI/CD/rerun routes do not bypass those constraints. Manual
or explicitly untyped execution remains possible; no universal
historical or NAV absence is claimed.

**Expense scope is unchanged:**51 API reenables, nine non-API
exclusions, baseline six cases and all consolidated regressions. The two
legacy Spend Requests methods remain conditional on not CLEAN30. Focused
microsoft#12325 review:21 files, including the two existing exclusion manifests.
General microsoft#11860 review:159 files.

The official NAV `Disable-NAVALTest` helper was inspected: it has no
destination/app-file parameter, writes NAV's App/DisabledTests using
per-codeunit filenames and sorts entries. It cannot safely preserve
these BCApps files. A bounded JSON relocation preserved original
prefixes/order and checked exact identities, then exercised the
unchanged real loader. No new shared helper/framework or NAV selector
change was made.

## Validation and presentation evidence

**Pester117/117 passed independently at the new Expense/general/full
heads.** Actual existing-loader checks confirm identical
effective193-method selection after relocation and preserved51/9 Expense
scope. All nine downstream Git tree hashes remain exactly unchanged.
Fresh exact-head CI is pending; old-head successes are not substituted
for current runtime evidence.

Historical run37330893173 at head88881be reached193 general methods:171
genuine401 failures and22 nominal passes (17 bare-ASSERTERROR cases can
accept the wrong error; five local fixtures). Separately, all51 Expense
methods passed in13 inspected countries (663 results), and all63 touched
API methods yielded819 results; Activity coverage was117/198 at that
checkpoint. These are bounded historical results, not a full/current
matrix pass. The preceding stage-fix runs hit50 hosted-runner
acquisition cancellations; other jobs were active, so this was not a
claimed global outage. New pushes schedule fresh CI, not an AL retry.
The general SQL-pool NRE and missing warning-reference artifacts remain
separate unresolved limitations.

Durable session presentation notes:
**api-test-enablement-presentation-notes.md**, with source-pinned
selection proof, fix/coverage inventory, helper limitations and
historical-vs-current evidence boundaries. Fresh runtime proof must
still establish the51 Expense cases and actual193-case suppression at
Expense stage.


[AB#646383](https://dynamicssmb2.visualstudio.com/1fcb79e7-ab07-432a-a3c6-6cf5a88ba4a5/_workitems/edit/646383)
(link only). Native stack #12327 remains microsoft#12325 → microsoft#11860 → microsoft#11224 →
microsoft#11225 → microsoft#11226 → microsoft#11227 → microsoft#11228 → microsoft#11229 → microsoft#11230 → microsoft#11322. Protected
merged microsoft#10085/microsoft#11862/microsoft#11891 and validation microsoft#11892 are untouched;
validation-only microsoft#11861/microsoft#11455 remain Do Not Merge. No new main
integration, native-group/base change, PR merge, queue operation,
Actions cancellation or manual retry was made. All prior heads remain
ancestors; source publication used backups and an atomic forward-only
push with explicit leases.

Exact current head: `bd3bbc04e13965f967a26eef435bdbf0cbc09ad7`; source
tree: `2b8c47b138846f63bd49d47188f54ea7e86c1f24`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot-Session: 3952f078-a881-4da8-ad96-13b727e48a91
@t-prda
Prangshuman Das (t-prda) marked this pull request as draft October 7, 2026 13:12
@t-prda

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded by the native PR stack #12697 (#12674 to #12684, all green). Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Team: Integrations GitHub request for Integrations area

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants