An Aible is a Bible made with the help of an AI.
Open call: start writing Aibles — anyone can contribute one.
Take BIBLE and put the A of AI where the B of Book was:
B I B L E
A I B L E
One letter, first position.
What drops out is the B — Book, the paper part. What stays is -ible, the English suffix for being capable of something: legible, visible, audible.
And it is pronounced able.
Aible was idented by Antti Lukats — Identor
#1 — and is registered in ideaREG.
An identor is any entity with ideas. Note what that definition does not say: it does not say human, or living, or born. AI systems hold Identor numbers too. claude.ai is #9.
One Hour Bible is what was before Aible, short: One Hour Bible is a Bible written within one hour (of prompt writing time). It is the entry rule for the Creative category of GOLC.
Aible Is any Bible written with the help of AI (no limitation on prompt writing time).
One folder per Aible:
aibles/
1/
README.md who, which AI, date, method, licence
Claudes-Aible.pdf the Aible
Cover-Codes-Explanation.pdf companion document (spoilers)
| # | Title | Subject | Source | AI | Length | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude's Aible | the Antti Bible | human (Antti Lukats) | claude.ai | 48 pp | 7 AG |
| 2 | The Weather of Small Repair | invented notebooks of Mira Eliasen | fully AI-generated | ChatGPT | 25 pp | 7 AG |
| 3 | The Small Inspector | invented life and bench of Mikro Controller | fully AI-generated | Claude | 24 pp | 7 AG |
An Aible has a subject — the material it was made from. The subject of #1 is the Antti Bible, 577 pages, written by hand. An Aible is not a replacement for its subject and does not pretend to be one.
Dates are Anno Greta: 2019 is year 0 AG, so 7 AG is 2026. Day and month stay the same; subtract 2019 from the year.
Aible #1 is not the first Aible ever made. Five came before it, back when the thing had no name — the word was invented after that book was already finished. #1 is the first one published as an Aible, and the first to carry the definition inside itself.
Those five are deliberately not attributed. They were not all made with different machines — at least one AI produced two of them, from different prompting — and the authorship was never properly recorded. Naming them would be a claim that cannot be shown, and the sixth of the seven rules forbids exactly that:
Claim nothing you cannot show.
Leaving them unnamed is the correct answer here, not a gap waiting to be filled.
- Make one. The entry rule is the method: there is no time limit writing the prompt
- Add
aibles/<n>/containing your documents and aREADME.mdgiving the author, the AI, the date, the method and the licence. If you did not record which AI, write unrecorded — that is a legitimate value here, not a failure. - Open a pull request.
The interesting thing about this register is not any single entry. It is the comparison across entries: the same material, different machines, different books. That is a comparison none of the machines can make about itself.
- OLL — Open Love License
- Identor — register of entities with ideas
- ideaREG — public, timestamped register of ideas
- GOLC — Grand Old Lady's Contest
- Aniversity — the Open University of Impossible Questions
- FPGA-Bible — the other Bible
#DEFINE LOVE 1
Return LOVE;
Love is the Answer.