Repository navigation
docs(developer-experience): add control-CLI pitfalls to build-cli contract - #9536
Conversation
Lane-Activity: work-resolve-issue/resolve-issue
|
claude-security-review reviewed No security issues found in this incremental change ( The diff does three things:
The file is reference documentation. It has no code, manifest, workflow or trust-gate path, and no critical-findings: 0 |
|
claude-review reviewed Incremental review of The change touches rows 12, 13 and 15:
The closing issue #9533 lists acceptance criteria: five rows with a pointer, an as-of date and a trigger, one eval case, and two greps. This edit leaves rows 12, 13 and 15 each with all three. I did not re-check the eval or grep criteria, since those files are unchanged since the last review. I didn't run any commands or checks. The PR description's verification claims are the author's and I haven't confirmed them. |
|
pr-unblock / address-feedback finished round 1 of 3 on 7ddb412. |
|
The pr-unblock lane stopped on this pull request and needs a person: the review replies the lane recorded did not pass validation, so none was posted.
To resume, deal with the reason above, remove the gh workflow run pr-unblock.yml -R melodic-software/claude-code-plugins -f pr-number=9536 -f activity=address-feedback |
…'s sourcing typos rejected "signalling". claude-review: rows 12 and 15 cite one product's own behavior; they now say the general rule is this plugin's application of it, like rows 11 and 14. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes #9533
Summary
Opened by the work-resolve-issue lane. The run's own summary:
Not verified
Fix
Verification
The runner ran each check from the base copy against 7ddb412:
The run reports:
Left out: the items under Not verified.
Related
#9533