Repository navigation
[Claude] Corrige a licença nos guias do pacote e valida o texto - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Os guias de distribuição ainda diziam MIT depois da troca para Apache-2.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed / O que mudou
docs/en/distribution.mdanddocs/pt-BR/distribution.mdnow say that PGMS's original work is under Apache-2.0. They still said MIT after the license change. / Os guias agora dizem Apache-2.0; ainda diziam MIT depois da troca de licença.Test-PublicDocumentation.ps1now fails if either guide omits Apache-2.0 or mentions MIT. / A validação agora falha se um dos guias não citar Apache-2.0 ou citar MIT.These guides are copied into the package as
READ-ME.mdandLEIA-ME.md, so the v0.1.0-alpha.5 package still carries the old sentence. Its assets are not replaced, to keep checksums and attestations valid; the release page has a note, and the next package gets the fix.ManifestSha256is re-frozen with the next version bump.Why / Por quê
The packaged guides contradicted the
LICENSEfile included in v0.1.0-alpha.5.Validation actually run / Validação realmente executada
Test-PublicDocumentation.ps1before the guide fix: failed ondocs/en/distribution.md, as intended.Test-PublicDocumentation.ps1after the guide fix: valid.Documentation and validation script only; application tests and package scripts were not run.
Checklist
docs/enanddocs/pt-BR(and both READMEs) when relevant. / Documentação pública atualizada emdocs/enedocs/pt-BR(e nos dois READMEs) quando pertinente.🤖 Generated with Claude Code