Separate branch for unsupported features?

[alextrob]

I like that you're documenting even the unsupported features, but I wonder if it would be better to put them in a separate branch or something so that we have to go (slightly) out of our way to learn about them.

It would at least make it clear what is and isn't supported from the top level.

[jorilallo]

I think I'll keep things in the master as you'll either way see the data in the responses. One thing that has occured to me is, if we should allow people to hide embedded media from the requests. Now the payload size can be pretty massive so it would make sense that you could just requests your urls without the payload. What do you think?

[alextrob]

Yeah that's a good point about the size. I like having all the media data there for a full client, but I imagine it would be wasteful for a lot of other tools and services.