Skip to content

Document 1Password SSO/identity flow limitation#439

Merged
masnwilliams merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
hypeship/1password-no-sso-note
Jul 8, 2026
Merged

Document 1Password SSO/identity flow limitation#439
masnwilliams merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
hypeship/1password-no-sso-note

Conversation

@masnwilliams

@masnwilliams masnwilliams commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Add a Supported Login Types section to the 1Password integration docs clarifying that Managed Auth fills direct logins (username/password + TOTP) from 1Password.
  • Add a warning callout that SSO and other identity-provider flows ("Sign in with Google", etc.) are not supported, because the 1Password API only exposes stored credential values, not identity sessions.

Why

The docs described TOTP and direct credential support but never stated that SSO/identity flows are unsupported, which came up as a gap when explaining the integration's scope.

Preview

https://tbd-6fc993ce-hypeship-1password-no-sso-note.mintlify.app/integrations/1password

Test plan

  • Verify the new section renders correctly in Mintlify preview

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only change with no runtime or security behavior impact.

Overview
Adds a Supported Login Types section after TOTP in integrations/1password.mdx so Managed Auth scope is explicit: direct 1Password logins (username/password and optional TOTP), including signing into an IdP like Google with stored credentials.

A Warning callout states that 1Password linked-item “sign in with” references (e.g. PostHog → sign in with Google) are not available via the 1Password API, so users should store a direct login for the target site instead.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 222a52c. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Add a callout clarifying that Managed Auth fills direct logins
(username/password + TOTP) from 1Password, and that SSO/identity-provider
flows are unsupported because the 1Password API only exposes stored
credential values.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@masnwilliams masnwilliams marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2026 17:50

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low.

I inspected the actual diff and found a single documentation-only addition in integrations/1password.mdx clarifying supported 1Password login types. There are no codepath, infrastructure, auth, permission, or production behavior changes, and I didn't find a CODEOWNERS file requiring owner review. No prior approval was present, so I'm approving this PR.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

Direct logins to identity providers (e.g. signing into Google/Gmail with a
stored username/password/TOTP) work. The unsupported case is 1Password's
"sign in with" linked-item reference, which is not exposed via the API.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@masnwilliams masnwilliams merged commit 91166be into main Jul 8, 2026
4 checks passed
@masnwilliams masnwilliams deleted the hypeship/1password-no-sso-note branch July 8, 2026 17:52

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Risk assessment: Very Low.

I inspected the actual diff for the current head and found a single documentation-only addition in integrations/1password.mdx clarifying supported 1Password login types. The change doesn't modify codepaths, prompts used for model behavior, infrastructure, auth/permissions logic, or production runtime behavior. I also found no CODEOWNERS file in the repository and no pending review requests indicating code-owner review.

This PR was already approved, so I'm leaving this assessment as a comment-only review rather than re-approving.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers

@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Kernel 🔴 Failed Jul 8, 2026, 6:06 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant