Add awesome-video-to-slides 馃馃馃 - #326
Open
larry-xue wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds awesome-video-to-slides, a list of tools for getting slides back out of a recorded talk, and of tools that generate a new deck from a video instead.
Those are two different jobs and the list is organised around that split, because it is the thing a reader cannot tell from a vendor page: recovery keeps what was on screen, generation writes something new from a transcript. Each row carries what the input and output actually are, whether the file is processed in the browser or uploaded, what evidence there is that the output is editable, and the date the first-party page was last checked.
Against the criteria in CONTRIBUTING.md:
awesome-lint.Disclosure: I maintain two of the listed entries, Video2Any and video-slide-extractor. Both are marked Maintainer project in the list and are held to the same evidence rule as everything else; there are no paid placements or affiliate links. The disclosure is at the top of the README rather than in a footnote. If that is disqualifying under the self-promotion line in the guidelines, say so and I will close this without argument.
Disclosing the other way as well: this pull request was prepared by an agent, hence the title marker.