Skip to content

[raft] Make raft runnable-locally - #1536

Open
the-glu wants to merge 18 commits into
interuss:masterfrom
Orbitalize:local_raft
Open

[raft] Make raft runnable-locally#1536
the-glu wants to merge 18 commits into
interuss:masterfrom
Orbitalize:local_raft

Conversation

@the-glu

@the-glu the-glu commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR follows #1556

It adds raft as a profile for make start-locally

tested with COMPOSE_PROFILES=with-raft make start-locally

@barroco barroco added the dss-raft Relating to the application-layer consensus implemenation based on raft label Jun 17, 2026

@mickmis mickmis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIUC this enables only running a single raft node? But with the default config (2 USS nodes), those will not be pooled?

@the-glu

the-glu commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

IIUC this enables only running a single raft node? But with the default config (2 USS nodes), those will not be pooled?

Hum I'm not 100% sure because this crossed when the default changed, but that on the monitoring side that you can have multiples USS, not here no? I don't see it in files there but on the other repo yes.

@mickmis mickmis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hum I'm not 100% sure because this crossed when the default changed, but that on the monitoring side that you can have multiples USS, not here no? I don't see it in files there but on the other repo yes.

You are right I got mixed-up with the other deployment :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dss-raft Relating to the application-layer consensus implemenation based on raft

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants