fix(ai): report compacted model context - #312
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 40 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe chat budget meter now uses ChangesChat budget integration
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant LeftPanel
participant useChatBudget
participant MainProcessChatBudget
LeftPanel->>useChatBudget: Pass project, session, and messages
useChatBudget->>useChatBudget: Compute renderer fallback
useChatBudget->>MainProcessChatBudget: Request native budget
MainProcessChatBudget-->>useChatBudget: Return usage or unavailable result
useChatBudget-->>LeftPanel: Return native usage or fallback budget
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review The earlier automated review was rate-limited; requesting a fresh substantive review now that the cooldown has elapsed. |
|
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/components/ai-edition/useChatBudget.test.ts`:
- Around line 27-105: Add tests in the useChatBudget suite covering the
no-session path, an undefined native budget result, and a rejected chatBudget
call. For each scenario, render useChatBudget with an appropriate setup and
assert usedTokens remains the renderer estimate, including handling the rejected
promise without replacing it with native usage.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: fe59ab43-48f5-4885-84be-fe1e5958669c
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/ai-edition/LeftPanel.tsxsrc/components/ai-edition/chatBudget.tssrc/components/ai-edition/useChatBudget.test.tssrc/components/ai-edition/useChatBudget.ts
|
Addressed the fresh review in |
|
Follow-up test harness fix is now on exact head |
Summary
chatBudgetendpoint, which measures the messages actually sent to the modelThis is a follow-up to #238: preserving the complete transcript was correct, but it meant the transcript-based meter no longer reflected the compacted model payload.
Related issue
Related to #238
Type of change
Release impact
Desktop impact
Screenshots / video
Not included; the context pill retains its existing UI and now receives the correct post-compaction value.
Testing
npx vitest --run src/components/ai-edition/useChatBudget.test.ts(3 passed)npm run test(1,680 passed, 1 skipped across 141 files)npx tsc --noEmitnpx tsc -p tsconfig.test.json --noEmitnpx biome checkon all four changed filesnpm run docs:checknpm run i18n:checknpm run build-viteAuthored with Codex assistance and manually verified against the native
modelMessages(session)budget path.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests