Repository navigation
Update JavaRosa to 6.0.0 - #105
Merged
Merged
Conversation
- update IFunctionHandler to match changes in javarosa/#837 commit 0230651
lindsay-stevens
force-pushed
the
javarosa-6.0.0
branch
from
October 29, 2026 07:25
d909f1c to
87757e1
Compare
lognaturel
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2026
lognaturel
left a comment
lognaturel
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you!
We have JR 7.0 coming up soon but I don't think it makes any changes that will be visible to Validate. We can decide whether or not to prioritize upgrade when it's out.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also update IFunctionHandler to match changes in getodk/javarosa#837 commit getodk/javarosa@0230651
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Ran
gradle clean check jarlocally, and checked the CI workflow was successful (run log here).Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
pyxform currently bundles Validate v1.2.0 (released 2026-01-09) which has JavaRosa v5.1.0. JavaRosa v6.0.0 was released 2026-08-21, so this update would allow pyxform to update Validate accordingly. In the JavaRosa release note there are some changes that seem relevant to pyxform, such as validation of choices and date/time values.
Are there any risks to merging this code? If so, what are they?
I only considered what was required for the jar build to work with the new JavaRosa version. I didn't look at it from a wider maintenance perspective e.g. are there any other sensible changes to Validate code, tests, or open issues for the new JavaRosa version; or anything about the project build process or other dependencies (the built jar is about the same size, 5.6MB).