Repository navigation
Conversation
Spec for gHashTag/trios crates/trios-rainbow-bridge (8b229e9489ee, 252 lines, 5 public functions), per issue #9474. - Seven-branch legality predicate (INV-8) inside Bridge_accept, in the original's order: channel/payload mismatch, Lamport monotonicity, duplicate claim, heartbeat staleness, unsigned honey, split-brain State commits, funnel latency budget. Every branch keeps real code. - BridgeError is an enum with payloads; the verdict is a struct: the error kind plus one named slot per variant payload. - The agent -> lamport HashMap and the lane -> claim/heartbeat maps are fixed-capacity parallel arrays with a len slot (MAX_SLOTS = 8). - FunnelClient.publish (network), HoneySigner.verify (crypto) and MerkleChain.root_hex (crypto) are caller-driven plumbing: the measured funnel latency and the honey signature verdict arrive as parameters, and Bridge_merkle_root_hex keeps its name with an undefined body that no test calls. Verified: t27c parse + typecheck clean (0 errors, 0 warnings); spec-status IMPLEMENTED; t27c gen emits 580 lines with zero "not yet implemented" markers; t27c test-report runs 11 tests, 11 pass, 0 vacuous, 0 BLOCKED. Closes #9474
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #9474 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![tri-claw[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/5166765?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head fb4fe3f373c3a63e1587c27d3751ded0f4ef3e61 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.5-flash, 9 turns, 332 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: Port meets all acceptance criteria but introduces RainbowEvent type conflict
criterion: "test -f specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27 && echo present" -- met -- brief.md:794
criterion: "grep -cE '^\s*(pub )?fn (Bridge_new|Bridge_register_honey_key|Bridge_merkle_root_hex|Bridge_lamport|Bridge_accept)(' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27" -- met -- brief.md:795
criterion: "t27c gen specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27 > /tmp/t27-gen.zig && grep -c 'not yet implemented' /tmp/t27-gen.zig" -- met -- brief.md:796
criterion: "t27c spec-status specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27" -- met -- brief.md:798
criterion: "grep -cE '^[[:space:]]*test[[:space:]]+("|[A-Za-z_])' specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27" -- met -- brief.md:799
criterion: "t27c test-report specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27 2>&1 | grep -c BLOCKED" -- met -- brief.md:800
discounted-check: cli-tri -- build errors in unrelated files (cli/tri/src/piddir.rs, cli/tri/src/nownote.rs), not in ported code
discounted-check: duplicate-bodies -- same failure on master, no new duplicate bodies added (brief.md:638-639)
discounted-check: t27b-native-ratchet -- same failure on master (brief.md:741-743)
blocking-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- RainbowEvent type name conflict: bridge.t27 defines a complete struct while subscriber.t27 has a placeholder (brief.md:585-634)
Evidence
Based on my analysis, here's the evidence:
Acceptance Criteria Verification:
All 6 acceptance criteria were verified as PASSED:
- ✅ File exists:
test -f specs/port/trios/crates/trios-rainbow-bridge/src/bridge.t27 && echo presentprintedpresent - ✅ All 5 functions present:
grepfound exactly 5 functions (Bridge_new, Bridge_register_honey_key, Bridge_merkle_root_hex, Bridge_lamport, Bridge_accept) - ✅ Generated code has no "not yet implemented":
grepreturned 0 - ✅ File parses:
t27c spec-statusreturnedIMPLEMENTED - ✅ At least 5 tests:
grepfound 11 tests - ✅ No BLOCKED tests:
grepreturned 0 BLOCKED
Red Checks Analysis:
-
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) - BLOCKING CHECK
- This IS a defect introduced by this PR
- The logs show "+ RainbowEvent NEW conflict"
- The PR defines
RainbowEventin bridge.t27 (lines 109-116) as:pub struct RainbowEvent { agent: u64, lamport: u64, channel: Channel, payload: Payload, is_signed: bool, sig_ok: bool } - This conflicts with the existing placeholder definition in subscriber.t27 (lines 18-21):
pub struct RainbowEvent { // Fields would be defined in the original event module // For this port, we'll use a placeholder struct }
-
duplicate-bodies - DISCOUNTED
- NOT a defect from this PR - same failure on master
- The log shows "No new duplicate body, and no known group grew"
- This is a ledger issue unrelated to the port
-
cli-tri - DISCOUNTED
- NOT a defect from this PR - build errors in unrelated files
- Errors are in
cli/tri/src/piddir.rsandcli/tri/src/nownote.rs - These are unrelated to the ported code
-
t27b-native-ratchet - DISCOUNTED
- NOT a defect from this PR - same failure on master
- The ratchet verdict was already red before this PR
Conclusion:
The port successfully implements all required functions and passes all acceptance criteria. The only real defect introduced is the RainbowEvent type conflict, which occurs because this PR needs a complete RainbowEvent struct for the bridge implementation, while subscriber.t27 has an incomplete placeholder definition.
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Closes #9474
Written by a bee on
queen-9474and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code