t27b checked: test blocks for 7 specs in specs/tools/tri (2 of 8) - #6583
Conversation
Each spec now has one test block with 4 assertions that verify constant values. This moves these specs from pass_vacuous to checked passes in t27b coverage testing. Closes #6463
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #6463 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head fd6ad1e750fcf2f888faf8ddc6ecf0d71a182b5b (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 12 turns, 613 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: FR-006 not met: PR body is empty and must contain "t27b-blog: +7 " line per issue #6463
criterion: FR-006 (PR body blog line) -- unmet -- evidence: PR body empty, no t27b-blog: +7 line
discounted-check: duplicate-bodies -- same failure on master 7e49725
discounted-check: spec-guards -- same failure on master 7e49725
Evidence
I'll continue the review by analyzing the final checks:
Criterion 1: FR-006 (PR body line) - UNMET
The PR body is completely empty. FR-006 requires adding a blog entry line t27b-blog: +7 <spec paths> to the PR body to document which bee work moved the t27b passes count.
Evidence: PR body shows no text (empty), diff shows no PR body content, issue #6463 explicitly states "write t27b-blog: +N <spec paths> in the PR body".
Red Check Analysis
duplicate-bodies -- DISCOUNTED
- Why: Same failure on master (commit 7e49725). The log shows "duplicate bodies: 606 of 5228" and the PR did not introduce new duplicates.
- Evidence: brief.md line 109: "on master: master 7e49725: failure" and line 153: "duplicate bodies: 606 of 5228 in 177 group(s) across 1283 spec(s)"
spec-guards -- DISCOUNTED
- Why: Same failure on master (commit 7e49725). The log shows DRIFTED issues that existed before this PR.
- Evidence: brief.md line 161: "on master: master 7e49725: failure" and the DRIFTED items (ring-096-rust, ring-097-rust) were already present
Summary
All 14 success criteria from issue #6463 are met:
- Each of the 7 specs has exactly one test block with 4 assertions ✓
- All assertions pass (t27c test-report prints FAIL 0 and pass count 2) ✓
- All files are ASCII-only and contain only .t27 files ✓
- Each spec has constants properly tested ✓
However, FR-006 is not met: the PR body lacks the required t27b-blog: +7 <spec paths> line. This is a clear formatting requirement that the PR body should contain.
2 participants
Closes #6463
Written by a bee on
queen-6463and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code